ROMAN-4156: Add MSOS L4 detection efficiency catalog schema

[alexstuk]

Resolves N/A (external ticket: ROMAN-4156)

Closes # N/A

This PR adds a new MSOS Level 4 Detection Efficiency catalog schema:

• latest/SSC/MSOS/wfi_microlensing_detection_efficiency_catalog_level_4.yaml

To wire this schema into RAD packaging/validation, this PR also:

• adds versioned schema symlink:
  • src/rad/resources/schemas/SSC/MSOS/wfi_microlensing_detection_efficiency_catalog_level_4-1.0.0.yaml
• updates pyproject.toml:
  • adds the new schema path to asdf_schema_xfail_tests

Tasks

• Update or add relevant rad tests.
• Update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page.
• Does this PR change any schema files?
• Schema changes were discussed at RAD Review Board meeting.
• Does this PR change any API used downstream? (No; please add label no-changelog-entry-needed.)
• Write news fragment(s) in changes/.

I do not have maintainer permissions in spacetelescope/rad; maintainers may need to apply labels and run org-side workflow steps.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.03%. Comparing base (5e16410) to head (6aafb09).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #838      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.56%   86.03%   -0.54%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        1154     1131      -23     
==========================================
- Hits          999      973      -26     
- Misses        155      158       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[PaulHuwe]

Is there an update to this ticket?

[ejoliet]

SSC is under AT period - Jen will get back to this asap.

[PaulHuwe]

Is this intended to be in the intermediate release? If so, we need this done and fully approved by COB Thursday.

[cjarnold]

Is this intended to be in the intermediate release? If so, we need this done and fully approved by COB Thursday.

detection efficiency is a commissioning product, so no we are not trying to get this into the intermediate release.

[alexstuk]

Updated to include DE-specific metadata for inject_medium and file-level TP/FP/TN/FN row counts, based on science clarification.

[jbrookens]

@kdupriestsci @bhayden53

RAD Archive Diff Report

Generated: 2026-06-11 19:07:46Z

Summary

• Roman db fields to add: 5
• Roman db fields to modify: 0
• Roman db fields to remove: 0
• Rita db fields to add: 0
• Rita db fields to modify: 0
• Rita db fields to remove: 0
• Destinations with datatype changes: 0

---

Roman — db fields to add

|fn_count|SSC|WFIMSOSCatalog|fn_count|0||SSC.fn_count|
|fp_count|SSC|WFIMSOSCatalog|fp_count|0||SSC.fp_count|
|inject_medium|SSC|WFIMSOSCatalog|inject_medium|1||SSC.inject_medium|
|tn_count|SSC|WFIMSOSCatalog|tn_count|0||SSC.tn_count|
|tp_count|SSC|WFIMSOSCatalog|tp_count|0||SSC.tp_count|

Roman — db fields to modify

Roman — db fields to remove

Rita — db fields to add

Rita — db fields to modify

Rita — db fields to remove

Datatype changes by destination

[WilliamJamieson]

Could you add a change log fragment, see

rad/.github/pull_request_template.md

Lines 27 to 33 in 666cc52

	<details><summary>News fragment change types:</summary>
	- `changes/<PR#>.feature.rst`: new feature
	- `changes/<PR#>.bugfix.rst`: fixes an issue
	- `changes/<PR#>.doc.rst`: documentation change
	- `changes/<PR#>.removal.rst`: deprecation or removal of public API
	- `changes/<PR#>.misc.rst`: infrastructure or miscellaneous change

[alexstuk]

Thanks for the review. I added the changelog fragment for the detection efficiency schema addition.

[cjarnold]

Slight difference in naming of this file vs what we called it in the interface
wfi_microlensing_detection_efficiency_catalog_level_4 (this file)
wfi_microlensing_detection_efficiency_product_level_4 (interface)

Nothing will break, so not a huge deal. If "catalog" is truly better than "product" we can migrate the interface naming in the future, but not high priority.