-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
Add GetTypeDescription.srv (rep2011) #153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
2cbbd21
fb7a19c
6f8d286
71c97ae
6756fdb
c5998a7
2ec42ec
1db9478
a2b4f4e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
| # ROS interface type name, in PACKAGE/NAMESPACE/TYPENAME format | ||
| string type_name | ||
|
|
||
| # REP-2011 RIHS hash string, which looks like RIHSxx_hashvalue | ||
| string type_version_hash | ||
| --- | ||
| # True if the type description information is available and populated in the response | ||
|
emersonknapp marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
| bool successful | ||
| # Empty if 'successful' was true, otherwise contains details on why it failed | ||
|
emersonknapp marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
| string failure_reason | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Rename this to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think something went wrong here, this became
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think that might have been intentional since it's no longer multi purpose? I'm not sure I haven't re-reviewed this yet.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Correct, changed back on purpose, see #153 (comment) |
||
|
|
||
| # The idl or msg file name | ||
| string type_description_raw_file_name | ||
|
|
||
| # The idl or msg file, with comments and whitespace | ||
| # The file extension and/or the contents can be used to determine the format | ||
| # This contains all recursive raw files, each separated by a line of 80 '=' characters | ||
| # The order will be the same as the TypeDescription - | ||
| # which is top level interface then referenced type descriptions in alphabetical order by type_name | ||
| string type_description_raw | ||
|
emersonknapp marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
|
|
||
| # The parsed type description which can be used programmatically | ||
| TypeDescription type_description | ||
|
|
||
| # Key-value pairs of extra information. | ||
| string[] extra_information_keys | ||
| string[] extra_information_values | ||
|
emersonknapp marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.