Skip to content

refactorings/#139-use-lpg-profiles - #1417

Draft
sagemaso wants to merge 10 commits into
devfrom
refactorings/#139-use-lpg-profiles
Draft

sagemaso wants to merge 10 commits into
devfrom
refactorings/#139-use-lpg-profiles

Conversation

@sagemaso

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #139

Integrates lpg profiles into pipeline.
set default="lpg" in cli.py to use lpg profiles.
Still needs to add lpg data automatically into the databundle.

📋 Pull Request Guidelines

Please read the Pull Request Guidelines carefully before creating your PR.


🧑‍💻 Contributor Checklist

Before requesting a review, make sure you've completed all of the following:

  • All tests pass locally or via CI
    (for more information on local test, check tox in the Contributing section)
    (CI tests are automatically executed when creating a PR, you can see the results of the checks below)
  • Workflow has run at least once in Test mode
    (optional if no dataset changes are involved)
  • Relevant documentation is updated (API, new features, etc.)
  • Dataset-versions are updated when existing datasets are adjusted.
  • Added a note to CHANGELOG.rst about the changes
  • Added yourself to AUTHORS.rst

Optional:

  • Changes have been tested in Everything mode
  • Extend the checklist for reviewers: Which aspects should be reviewed in particular?
<!-- Example:
Please focus on validating the data handling in file XYZ.
-->

🔍 Reviewer Checklist

During your review, please check the following:

  • Is the code clean, readable, and efficient? Are there any oddities or obvious inefficiencies?
  • Does the code work as expected? (should already be verified by contributor)
  • Do all tests pass? (see CI results)
  • Is the documentation complete and up to date?
  • Is CHANGELOG.rst updated accordingly?
  • Is all necessary metadata complete and correct?
    • If metadata is pending: Is there an appropriate issue filed?

📝 Additional Notes (optional)


💡 Tip: If you add multiple reviewers, clarify who should check what — this saves time and avoids duplicated efforts.

@sagemaso
sagemaso requested a review from nesnoj April 28, 2026 13:57
@nesnoj nesnoj added this to the Extra_features_reGon milestone Jul 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify metadata format

2 participants