docs: resolve duplicate minutes and document public CI evidence

.github/scripts/report_external_links.py

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+"""On-demand, advisory external-link report; never a PR merge gate."""
+from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
+from pathlib import Path
+import os
+import re
+from urllib.error import HTTPError, URLError
+from urllib.parse import urlsplit
+from urllib.request import Request, urlopen
+
+
+def eligible(url):
+    parsed = urlsplit(url)
+    host = (parsed.hostname or '').lower()
+    return (parsed.scheme in {'http', 'https'} and bool(host)
+            and not parsed.username and not parsed.password
+            and not (host == 'zoom.us' or host.endswith('.zoom.us'))
+            and host not in {'docs.google.com', 'drive.google.com'}
+            and not re.search(r'(?:token|password|pwd|secret|key)=', parsed.query, re.I))
+
+
+def collect(root):
+    references = {}
+    for path in sorted(root.rglob('*')):
+        if path.name == 'external-link-report.md' or path.suffix not in {'.md', '.rst'} or '.git' in path.relative_to(root).parts:
+            continue
+        # Operational guidance and indexes; historical minutes need a separate review.
+        if re.match(r'\d{4}-\d|\d{3}-', path.name):
+            continue
+        for number, line in enumerate(path.read_text(encoding='utf-8').splitlines(), 1):
+            for url in re.findall(r'https?://[^\s<>`"\)\]]+', line):
+                url = url.rstrip('.,;').split('#')[0]
+                if eligible(url):
+                    references.setdefault(url, []).append(f'{path.relative_to(root).as_posix()}:{number}')
+    return references
+
+
+def probe(url):
+    try:
+        request = Request(url, headers={'User-Agent': 'UXL-documentation-link-review/1.0'})
+        with urlopen(request, timeout=12) as response:
+            return ('reachable', str(response.status))
+    except HTTPError as error:
+        if error.code in {404, 410}:
+            return ('missing', str(error.code))
+        if error.code in {401, 403}:
+            return ('restricted or bot-blocked', str(error.code))
+        return ('retry or investigate', str(error.code))
+    except (URLError, TimeoutError, OSError, ValueError) as error:
+        return ('unverified', type(error).__name__)
+
+
+def report(root):
+    references = collect(root)
+    with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=8) as pool:
+        results = dict(zip(references, pool.map(probe, references)))
+    lines = ['# External documentation link review', '',
+             f'Checked {len(results)} unique URLs in guidance and indexes.', '',
+             'Advisory only: 403 responses may indicate access controls or bot protection. '
+             'A successful response does not verify page content or section anchors. '
+             'Dated minutes, archived RFCs, PDFs, restricted recording links and Google documents are excluded.', '',
+             '| Result | URL | Source |', '| --- | --- | --- |']
+    for url, (status, detail) in results.items():
+        if status != 'reachable':
+            safe_url = url.replace('|', '%7C')
+            sources = ', '.join(references[url]).replace('|', '\\|')
+            lines.append(f'| {status} ({detail}) | <{safe_url}> | {sources} |')
+    if all(status == 'reachable' for status, _ in results.values()):
+        lines.append('| No failed requests | — | — |')
+    return '\n'.join(lines) + '\n'
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    result = report(Path.cwd())
+    Path('external-link-report.md').write_text(result, encoding='utf-8')
+    if os.environ.get('GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY'):
+        with open(os.environ['GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY'], 'a', encoding='utf-8') as summary:
+            summary.write(result)
+    print(result)

.github/scripts/test_external_links.py

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+from urllib.error import HTTPError
+from unittest import TestCase
+from unittest.mock import patch
+from report_external_links import eligible, probe
+
+
+class ExternalLinkReportTests(TestCase):
+    def test_restricted_response_is_not_reported_as_dead(self):
+        with patch('report_external_links.urlopen', side_effect=HTTPError('https://example.org', 403, '', {}, None)):
+            self.assertEqual(probe('https://example.org'), ('restricted or bot-blocked', '403'))
+
+    def test_missing_response_is_reported(self):
+        with patch('report_external_links.urlopen', side_effect=HTTPError('https://example.org', 404, '', {}, None)):
+            self.assertEqual(probe('https://example.org'), ('missing', '404'))
+
+    def test_private_recording_and_credential_links_are_excluded(self):
+        for url in ['https://zoom.us/rec/share/abc', 'https://docs.google.com/document/d/abc',
+                    'https://example.org/?token=secret', 'https://user:password@example.org/']:
+            self.assertFalse(eligible(url))
+        self.assertTrue(eligible('https://uxlfoundation.org/'))

.github/workflows/external-links.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+name: External link review
+on:
+  workflow_dispatch:
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+jobs:
+  report:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 10
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+      - name: Report external link availability
+        run: python3 .github/scripts/report_external_links.py

.gitignore

@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 __pycache__/
+
+/external-link-report.md

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -46,3 +46,9 @@ For rendering and meeting-index checks, install `docutils==0.19` and run
 `python .github/scripts/check_document_structure.py`. The check reports malformed
 reStructuredText and dated records missing from sibling indexes. External URLs
 and cross-document section anchors still require review.
+
+Maintainers can run **External link review** from the Actions tab to obtain an
+advisory report for guidance and indexes. It distinguishes missing pages from
+access restrictions and transient failures, and does not block pull requests.
+PDFs and restricted meeting materials are excluded. To run locally, use
+`python .github/scripts/report_external_links.py`; it writes `external-link-report.md`.

meetings/notes/2025-06-22.rst

@@ -1,140 +1,12 @@
-============================
-Open Source WG: 06/22/2025
-============================
+July 2025 meeting record: corrected filename
+============================================
 
-.. note::
+These minutes belong to the `July 22, 2025 meeting <2025-07-22.rst>`__.
 
-   Record verification pending: the body of these notes matches
-   `2025-07-22 <2025-07-22.rst>`__ apart from the meeting date. Both records
-   are preserved while the original calendar or recording is checked.
+`PR #230 <https://github.com/uxlfoundation/open-source-working-group/pull/230>`__
+published July's minutes under a June filename.
+`PR #231 <https://github.com/uxlfoundation/open-source-working-group/pull/231>`__
+then corrected the dates from June to July. This page preserves the earlier URL;
+it is not a separate June meeting record.
 
-Recording: A recording of the meeting is available in the Linux Foundation https://openprofile.dev/ profile. If you are
-a member of the Working Group you can access this through your account.
-
-Attendees
-===========
-
-* Megan Knight - Arm
-
-* Kuldeep Pal - C-DAC
-
-* Rod Burns - Codeplay
-
-* Abhishek Jain - Fujitsu
-
-* Ed Tuke - Imagination Technologies
-
-* Irina Topinskaia - Intel
-* John Melonakos - Intel
-* Andrey Fedorov - Intel
-* Nikolay Petrov - Intel
-* Mike Voss - Intel
-* Mourad Gouicem - Intel
-* Maria Petrova - Intel
-* Timmie Smith - Intel
-* Alexey Kukanov - Intel
-* Aleksandr Solovev - Intel
-* Vasudha Badri-Paul - Intel
-* Ian Faust - Intel
-
-
-Quick Recap
-=============
-
-The meeting began with introductions and agenda setting, followed by discussions about OFAC sanctions and updates from
-various open source projects. The team reviewed upcoming releases across multiple projects including oneDNN, oneDPL, and
-oneCCL, with specific focus on new features and performance improvements. The conversation ended with reminders about
-sharing work through presentations at upcoming events and thanks to participants.
-
-Next Steps
-============
-
-* Megan to reach out to OpenSSF security experts for guidance on implementing OFAC sanctions compliance
-* Megan to discuss OFAC sanctions implementation with Dolan and Rod
-* Megan to add OFAC sanctions discussion to next OpenSSF working group meeting agenda (scheduled for next Tuesday)
-* Megan to follow up with JDF contacts regarding OFAC sanctions guidance
-* Mourad to update release timeline for 3.9 release (potentially delayed due to PyTorch dependencies)
-* Maria to deliver patches for Battlemage and Arc GPU support
-* Maria to prepare patches for PyTorch 1.16 release (targeted for mid-August)
-* Maria to implement new C API design for 21.17 release (as non-default option)
-* Rod to send Open Source Summit recording links to meeting attendees
-* Rod to share Dev Summit call for presentations with meeting attendees
-
-Summary
-=========
-
-OFAC Sanctions and Project Updates:
-=====================================
-
-The meeting began with Megan introducing herself and the agenda, which included a focus on OFAC sanctions and updates
-from open source projects. Rod confirmed that the recordings from the Mini summit were published and agreed to send them
-out. The group discussed the OFAC sanctions issue raised by Michael Voss, with Michael providing an overview of the
-topic and emphasizing that he is not a lawyer. The conversation ended with a reminder for participants to add any
-additional agenda items to the chat or to Megan and John.
-
-Sanctions Compliance and Legal Implications:
-==============================================
-
-Mike explained the legal implications of sanctions against specially designated nationals, noting that US citizens and
-organizations must comply with these rules worldwide, even if unaware of violations. He highlighted that the rules
-impose strict liability, meaning any infractions can result in fines or criminal penalties, and emphasized that
-ownership of 50% or more by sanctioned individuals or organizations can also trigger sanctions.
-
-Open Source Contribution Policy Challenges:
-=============================================
-
-Mike raised concerns about the challenges of enforcing contribution policies for open source projects, particularly
-regarding unsolicited patches and two-way engagement with individuals or organizations on restricted lists. Megan
-acknowledged these issues and suggested exploring guidance from the Linux Foundation and OpenSSF, noting the need for
-unified policies across projects. She proposed taking the lead on this matter, including consulting with OpenSSF's
-security experts and discussing it with the operations team, to find practical solutions for identity management and
-contribution verification.
-
-oneDNN Updates:
-=================
-
-Mourad reported on oneDNN, mentioning a release candidate for 3.9 expected at the end of the week, with potential delays
-due to new features and PyTorch's schedule. They also noted interest from the Barcelona supercomputing group in adding
-RISC-V capabilities.
-
-oneMath Updates:
-==================
-
-Andrey said oneMath did not have much of a update. The are focused on maintenance releases at the moment.
-
-oneDAL Updates:
-=================
-
-Ian and Aleksandr ("Sasha") provided updates on oneDAL, mentioning bug fixes and preparation for the 2025.3 release in
-November.
-
-oneTBB Updates:
-=================
-
-Mike shared that oneTBB's next release in 2022.3 would focus on improvements to the tasking API, requested by the visual
-effects community. The team agreed that monthly releases generally work well for them, allowing for better feedback on
-dependencies.
-
-oneDPL Updates:
-=================
-
-The team discussed the status and development of oneDPL, a portable library for CPUs, which currently sees primarily
-Intel-related usage. Timmie reported ongoing work on range-based APIs for parallel algorithms and GPU performance
-improvements, particularly for set operation algorithms. Alexey explained that oneDPL's CPU support serves as an
-upstream source for the C++ standard library's parallel algorithms, though this relationship has recently become less
-active.
-
-oneCCL Updates:
-=================
-
-Maria provided updates on CCL, noting their work on supporting Battle Match ARB-PE and PyTorch upstream, with plans for
-a patch release in mid-August and a major release in October that will include a new C API design as a non-default
-option.
-
-Dev Summit Presentation Submissions Discussion:
-=================================================
-
-The meeting was shorter than usual due to the summer season, with Aaron absent from the office. Rod requested that John
-share videos from the Open Source Summit and a link to the Call for Presentations for the upcoming Dev summit. John
-encouraged all projects to submit presentations, emphasizing the importance of sharing their work within the
-foundation. The conversation ended with thanks from Megan and the participants.
+`Meeting index <README.rst>`__

meetings/notes/2025-07-22.rst

@@ -4,9 +4,10 @@ Open Source WG: 07/22/2025
 
 .. note::
 
-   Record verification pending: the body of these notes matches
-   `2025-06-22 <2025-06-22.rst>`__ apart from the meeting date. Both records
-   are preserved while the original calendar or recording is checked.
+   This is the corrected July record. `PR #231
+   <https://github.com/uxlfoundation/open-source-working-group/pull/231>`__
+   explicitly corrected the dates from June to July. The earlier
+   `June-labelled URL <2025-06-22.rst>`__ is retained as a redirect.
 
 Recording: A recording of the meeting is available in the Linux Foundation https://openprofile.dev/ profile. If you are
 a member of the Working Group you can access this through your account.

meetings/notes/README.rst

@@ -56,10 +56,7 @@ already published in this repository.
      - Infrastructure handover; hardware and administrator support; developer summit planning
      - `CI transition <../presentations/2025-08-26-UXL-Working-Group-CI-Transition.pdf>`__
    * - `2025-07-22 <2025-07-22.rst>`__
-     - Contribution policies and compliance; project updates (June/July record duplication under review)
-     - —
-   * - `2025-06-22 <2025-06-22.rst>`__
-     - Contribution policies and compliance; project updates (June/July record duplication under review)
+     - Contribution policies and compliance; updates from the six library projects
      - —
    * - `2025-05-27 <2025-05-27.rst>`__
      - Security progress; hardware runners; CPU-inclusive APIs; library proposals
@@ -91,3 +88,10 @@ already published in this repository.
 * `2024-03-26 <2024-03-26.rst>`__
 * `2024-02-27 <2024-02-27.rst>`__
 * `2024-01-24 <2024-01-24.rst>`__
+
+Corrected record URLs
+----------------------
+
+The `June-labelled record <2025-06-22.rst>`__ redirects to the July 22, 2025
+minutes following the date correction in PR #231. It is not counted as an
+additional meeting.

project-infrastructure/project-ci-documentation.md

@@ -23,6 +23,27 @@ The [August 2025 infrastructure discussion](../meetings/notes/2025-08-26.rst)
 records changes to hardware access and support. Earlier runner catalogues should
 not be used as current availability guarantees.
 
+## Public workflow evidence
+
+Reviewed September 9, 2026 using GitHub's successful workflow-run records.
+These are observed examples, not a complete coverage assessment or a guarantee
+that runners are currently available. A workflow-level success can include skipped
+jobs; inspect its jobs and logs before claiming support for a particular platform.
+Dates below are the run creation dates in UTC.
+
+| Project | Successful run observed | Run date | What the evidence establishes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| oneDNN | [CI AArch64](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneDNN/actions/runs/28283384460) | 2026-06-27 | A successful architecture-labelled CI workflow; this is older evidence, not current capacity verification. |
+| oneDAL | [docker-validation Nightly](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneDAL/actions/runs/34415652999) | 2026-09-09 | A successful nightly validation workflow; shared capacity and full platform coverage are not established. |
+| oneMath | [PR Tests (x86_64)](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneMath/actions/runs/33626039801), [PR Tests (aarch64)](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneMath/actions/runs/33626039750) | 2026-09-02 | Successful architecture-labelled PR workflows; GPU coverage is not established by these runs. |
+| oneTBB | [oneTBB CI](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneTBB/actions/runs/34341528354) | 2026-09-09 | A successful project CI workflow; inspect job results for the exact platform matrix. |
+| oneDPL | [oneDPL CI Docs](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneDPL/actions/runs/34399254049) | 2026-09-09 | Documentation CI only; this example does not establish functional CPU or GPU testing. |
+| oneCCL | [Coverity Scan](https://github.com/uxlfoundation/oneCCL/actions/runs/25319695571) | 2026-05-04 | An older static-analysis workflow; functional testing and current availability remain unverified. |
+
+Use each project's Actions page and maintainer guidance to obtain newer evidence.
+Update the verification date with the evidence; do not replace it merely because
+this document was edited.
+
 ## Previously reported shared capacity
 
 | Owner | Type | OS | Number | Verified availability | Notes |