[eric-stacks]

testing internal linking

[eric-stacks]

testing to see if internal docs links should be using gitbook specific url's or locally defined file paths

[claude]

Code Review

Summary

This PR successfully fixes a broken reference to the sBTC documentation section. The change is functionally correct - the target file exists at docs/learn/sbtc/README.md and the link will work.

Issues Found

1. Inconsistent Link Format (Medium Priority)

The updated link uses an absolute path (/docs/learn/sbtc/README.md), but other internal links in the same file use relative paths:

• Line 44 (new): [sBTC](/docs/learn/sbtc/README.md) ← absolute path
• Line 58 (existing): [What is Stacks](stacks-101/what-is-stacks.md) ← relative path

Recommendation: For consistency, consider using a relative path instead:

[sBTC](sbtc/README.md)

This follows the pattern used elsewhere in the file and is more portable if the documentation structure changes.

2. Other Broken References in Codebase (Low Priority for this PR)

There are 6 other files with broken-reference issues that should be addressed:

• docs/reference/stacks-node-configuration.md
• docs/reference/clarity/example-contracts/stacking.md
• docs/reference/signer-configuration.md
• docs/press-and-reports/press-and-top-links/2024/README.md
• docs/press-and-reports/press-and-top-links/2025/README.md
• docs/operate/stacking-stx/solo-stack.md
• docs/operate/run-a-signer/README.md

Consider creating a follow-up issue to fix these systematically.

Positive Aspects

• ✅ Fixes a broken reference that would have caused 404 errors
• ✅ Target file exists and is valid
• ✅ Simple, focused change
• ✅ Clear PR description

Verdict

Approve with minor suggestion - The fix works correctly. The inconsistency in link format is a minor style issue that doesn't affect functionality but should be considered for maintainability.

---

Reviewed by Claude Code