Update the buffer pool sizes based on the latest algorithm#28610
Open
stephenxs wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Update the buffer pool sizes based on the latest algorithm#28610stephenxs wants to merge 1 commit into
stephenxs wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <stephens@nvidia.com>
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines: There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run. |
|
Azure Pipelines: Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
jianyuewu
self-requested a review
July 24, 2026 01:01
jianyuewu
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
The SN6600 buffer pool sizes needed to be aligned with the latest buffer-sizing calculations.
Work item tracking
How I did it
Updated the ingress lossless, ingress lossy, egress lossless, and egress lossy pool sizes for the affected SN6600 physical and simx SKUs. Applied the calculated values consistently to both T0 and T1
buffer templates.
How to verify it
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tracking issue/work item for backport/cherry-pick request (GitHub issue or Microsoft ADO):
Failure type:
Tested branch
Test result
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)