[ptf] Improve runtime of verify_no_packet_any for large port sets#25347
Conversation
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@saiarcot895 Please help review |
Signed-off-by: AntonHryshchuk <antonh@nvidia.com>
498e6c2 to
b875be3
Compare
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azpw run |
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@lguohan - can you please help in reviewing this one? |
|
@AntonHryshchuk please let us know once the p4lang PR gets merged to the repo, so that we will have same patch. |
|
hi @kperumalbfn , we need this PR badly for 202511 full topo qual. the P4 change might take very long time to merge and release, and we can update the patch later once that is merged with any additional changes. |
|
this change only affects testing and no real feature impacts. |
kperumalbfn
left a comment
kperumalbfn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, please update the patch if any additional changes made in p4lang PR
|
@vmittal-msft pls merge to 202511 |
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202511: #25583 |
…nic-net#25347) [ptf] Improve runtimr of verify_no_packet_any for large port sets Signed-off-by: Feng Pan <fenpan@microsoft.com>
mssonicbld
added
Included in 202511 Branch
and removed
Created PR to 202511 Branch
labels
…5347) [ptf] Improve runtimr of verify_no_packet_any for large port sets Signed-off-by: dprital <drorp@nvidia.com>
…nic-net#25347) [ptf] Improve runtimr of verify_no_packet_any for large port sets Signed-off-by: mhchann <mhchann082@gmail.com>
…nic-net#25347) [ptf] Improve runtimr of verify_no_packet_any for large port sets
…nic-net#25347) [ptf] Improve runtimr of verify_no_packet_any for large port sets
7 participants
Why I did it
To reduce the runtime of tests
How I did it
Created PR for PTF repository, and added a patch to sonic-buildimage
p4lang/ptf#231
How to verify it
Run drop_packets tests in sonic-mgmt.
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)