-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
Separate iid from set x #1945
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
dgedon
merged 12 commits into
sbi-dev:gsoc-2026
from
Jocho-Smith:separate-iid-from-set-x
Jul 23, 2026
Merged
Separate iid from set x #1945
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
89bc9a2
Add .bind() method to potentials and fix _base_recursor scoping
Jocho-Smith 3e52f56
Add .bind() method to potentials and fix _base_recursor scoping
Jocho-Smith 30459d9
Merge branch 'bind-method-clean' of github.com:jocho-smith/sbi into b…
Jocho-Smith 8fdc10c
fix attempt with bound.neural_ode.params.update
Jocho-Smith 968b58b
checkpoint after full bind replacement of set_x
Jocho-Smith 84c4731
Merge branch 'gsoc-2026' into bind-method-clean
Jocho-Smith ee2adfa
fixup:slightly wrong last merge
Jocho-Smith 0fe9359
3 things: remove set_x from BasePotential.__init__; replace overlooke…
Jocho-Smith e8444c5
fix attempt: VI training broken due to bind
Jocho-Smith 81b0709
fixup: AttributeError: 'VectorFieldBasedPotential' object has no attr…
Jocho-Smith 04ccd2c
Merge upstream/gsoc-2026 into separate-iid-from-set-x
Jocho-Smith caa994d
reverted user_input_checks_utils changes; moved imports up; fixed iid…
Jocho-Smith File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Here we seem to have the same modifications that we dicussed in #1943 before.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ouh sorry. I messed up the merge. Will fix it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
compared with
set_x()we hard to_x_is_iidto True here. Since it's not a method argument, maybe True is a good default. We have to nesure though that it is set correctly in each inherited class. Because right now by callingsuper()in e.g. the likelihood potential, we will ahvex_is_iid=Trueby defaultUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is exactly what is happening right now on the main branch. likelihood calls super without _x_is_iid : https://github.com/sbi-dev/sbi/blob/main/sbi/inference/potentials/likelihood_based_potential.py#L80
BasePotential.init always calls set_x without any iid information: https://github.com/sbi-dev/sbi/blob/main/sbi/inference/potentials/base_potential.py#L33
x_is_iid is set with default value True: https://github.com/sbi-dev/sbi/blob/main/sbi/inference/potentials/base_potential.py#L60