Define an env for controlling UVloop - #58442
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: jugalshah291 <shah.jugal291@gmail.com>
jugalshah291
changed the title
jugalshah291
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 10, 2025 09:50
ray-gardener
Bot
added
serve
edoakes
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2025
edoakes
enabled auto-merge (squash)
November 10, 2025 16:33
landscapepainter
pushed a commit
to landscapepainter/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2025
> Briefly describe what this PR accomplishes and why it's needed. Our serve ingress keeps running into below error related to `uvloop` under heavy load ``` File descriptor 97 is used by transport ``` The uvloop team have a [PR](MagicStack/uvloop#646) to fix it, but seems like no one is working on it One of workaround mentioned in the ([PR](MagicStack/uvloop#646 (comment))) is to just turn off uvloop . We tried it in our env and didn't see any major performance difference Hence as part of this PR, we are defining a new env for controlling UVloop Signed-off-by: jugalshah291 <shah.jugal291@gmail.com>
SheldonTsen
pushed a commit
to SheldonTsen/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2025
> Briefly describe what this PR accomplishes and why it's needed. Our serve ingress keeps running into below error related to `uvloop` under heavy load ``` File descriptor 97 is used by transport ``` The uvloop team have a [PR](MagicStack/uvloop#646) to fix it, but seems like no one is working on it One of workaround mentioned in the ([PR](MagicStack/uvloop#646 (comment))) is to just turn off uvloop . We tried it in our env and didn't see any major performance difference Hence as part of this PR, we are defining a new env for controlling UVloop Signed-off-by: jugalshah291 <shah.jugal291@gmail.com>
Future-Outlier
pushed a commit
to Future-Outlier/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2025
> Briefly describe what this PR accomplishes and why it's needed. Our serve ingress keeps running into below error related to `uvloop` under heavy load ``` File descriptor 97 is used by transport ``` The uvloop team have a [PR](MagicStack/uvloop#646) to fix it, but seems like no one is working on it One of workaround mentioned in the ([PR](MagicStack/uvloop#646 (comment))) is to just turn off uvloop . We tried it in our env and didn't see any major performance difference Hence as part of this PR, we are defining a new env for controlling UVloop Signed-off-by: jugalshah291 <shah.jugal291@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <eric901201@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Our serve ingress keeps running into below error related to
uvloopunder heavy loadThe uvloop team have a PR to fix it, but seems like no one is working on it
One of workaround mentioned in the (PR) is to just turn off uvloop .
We tried it in our env and didn't see any major performance difference
Hence as part of this PR, we are defining a new env for controlling UVloop
Related issues
Additional information