Skip to content

docs: archive GNOME smoke strike report for titan-bluefin + titan-lts (closes #108)#209

Open
clubanderson wants to merge 1 commit into
projectbluefin:mainfrom
clubanderson:docs/gnome-smoke-strike-report-2026-05-26
Open

docs: archive GNOME smoke strike report for titan-bluefin + titan-lts (closes #108)#209
clubanderson wants to merge 1 commit into
projectbluefin:mainfrom
clubanderson:docs/gnome-smoke-strike-report-2026-05-26

Conversation

@clubanderson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Archives the Vanguard Lab Strike Report from #108 documenting the first recorded clean GNOME smoke run on both titan VMs (2026-05-26).

  • docs/archive/gnome-smoke-2026-05-26.md — full strike report with workflow output, VM state, and parameters
  • docs/archive/iteration-notes.md — baseline entry noting this as the reference point for titan fast-path regression detection

This was a clean green run — no fixes needed. Workflow bluefin-titan-smoke-xb9c2 succeeded 4/4 in 4m 50s on both latest and lts titan VMs.

Test plan

…closes projectbluefin#108)

Archive the Vanguard strike report from projectbluefin#108 documenting the first
recorded clean GNOME smoke run on both titan VMs. No fixes were needed —
this establishes the baseline for titan fast-path regression detection.

Signed-off-by: unknown <unknown@users.noreply.github.com>

@hanthor hanthor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM — docs-only, archiving test results/examples.

@hanthor hanthor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clear documentation addition. LGTM.

@hanthor hanthor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved via org-wide review.

@hanthor hanthor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved via org-wide review.

@castrojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR has merge conflicts with current main and needs a rebase before it can land.

@hanthor hanthor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review: Approved ✅

Part of the structured service-catalog project build-up. Conventional Commits format, referenced issues, consistent with related PRs in the series.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants