refactor(iyzico): one word meant two things in one crate, so name the other one

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -40,6 +40,19 @@ order releases happen, newest first.
 
 ### Changed
 
+- **`kasapay_iyzico::reporting::RefundStatus` is now `PaymentRefundStatus`.** A
+  rename and nothing else: the variants, the words it reads off the wire and
+  everything it does are unchanged, so a caller who names the type changes the
+  name and stops there.
+
+  `kasapay-iyzico` held both meanings of the word at once. `classic` and
+  `in_store` import `kasapay_core::RefundStatus`, which is where one refund has
+  got to — pending, succeeded, failed. `reporting` exported its own, which is
+  not a refund's status at all but how much of a *payment* has gone back:
+  `NotRefunded`, `PartiallyRefunded`, `TotallyRefunded`. One crate, one word,
+  two concepts, and a reader with the first in scope meeting the second gets no
+  warning. The new name is iyzico's own for the field, `paymentRefundStatus`.
+
 - **`Provider::cancel` answers a `Release` rather than a `Charge`, and now
   works everywhere a hold exists** (#169). It was `ErrorKind::Unsupported` at
   three of the four providers whose `Capabilities::separate_capture` is

CLAUDE.md

@@ -149,6 +149,11 @@ So four rules, in the order they pay.
 **One claim, one home.** `Provider::cancel` said the opposite of what it did in
 six places at once, because the same fact had been written six times. Every
 copy is a thing that can rot on its own. A second place cites the first.
+Which *word* to use is the same rule one level down, and its home is
+[`CONTEXT.md`](CONTEXT.md): not what a type does, which the type says, but
+which of several circulating words to reach for — a payer rather than a
+shopper, a `Buyer` being the details where a `customer` is the provider's
+handle, releasing a hold rather than voiding it.
 
 **A claim that can be checked becomes a check.** Not a promise to remember it.
 `conformance.rs` counts its own roster against `impl Provider for` in the

CONTEXT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+# kasapay
+
+One payment API over any payment provider.
+
+This file settles which word to use where several are in circulation. It does
+not define behaviour: each entry names the type or module that does, and that
+one is the authority.
+
+## The people
+
+**Payer**:
+The person paying. The role, in prose.
+_Avoid_: shopper, user
+
+**Buyer**:
+The payer's details a provider demands before it will take a payment. The
+type, `kasapay_core::Buyer` — never the role.
+_Avoid_: customer, purchaser
+
+**Customer**:
+A provider's own opaque handle for a payer it holds on file — Stripe's
+`customer`, Mollie's `customerId`, iyzico In-Store's `userId`. Never a person,
+and never a record kasapay keeps. See `ChargeRequest::customer`.
+_Avoid_: account, user id
+
+**Cardholder**:
+The payer, where what is being said is true of cards and not of other
+instruments.
+
+## The acts
+
+**Charge**:
+Taking money, and the record of having asked. `Provider::charge` starts one;
+`kasapay_core::Charge` is how a provider currently sees it. A `Charge` is not
+a completed payment.
+_Avoid_: transaction, sale
+
+**Payment**:
+The object a provider names with a `PaymentId`. What kasapay asked for is a
+charge; what the provider holds is a payment.
+
+**Hold**:
+Money an authorisation reserves and has not taken.
+_Avoid_: blocked funds, pending amount
+
+**Capture**:
+Taking money a hold reserved. It has no inverse — captured money is refunded,
+never un-captured.
+
+**Release**:
+Giving up a hold that will never be captured. `Provider::cancel` is the call;
+`kasapay_core::Release` is what comes back.
+_Avoid_: void (PayPal's word), reversal (iyzico's), cancellation
+
+**Refund**:
+Sending captured money back. Its own object with its own life, never a status
+the payment arrives in.
+
+## The code
+
+**Provider**:
+A payment service — Stripe, iyzico, Mollie, PayPal, PayTR — and the trait an
+adapter implements for one.
+
+**Adapter**:
+The crate that implements `Provider` for one provider. A provider is who takes
+the money; an adapter is the code that asks them to.
+
+**Order reference**:
+The caller's own name for an order, held by `OrderRef`. Not a `PaymentId`, even
+where the two carry the same characters.
+_Avoid_: order id, merchant reference
+
+## Spelling
+
+Prose uses **-ise**: authorise, authorisation, cancelling.
+
+**-ize** only where it names something somebody else spelled that way — the
+HTTP `Authorization` header, PayPal's `authorization` object, iyzico's Authorize
+service, or a Rust identifier such as `Status::Authorized`, whose variants carry
+the provider's spelling rather than this one.

crates/kasapay-iyzico/src/errors.rs

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 //! # iyzico's own `Retry` column is not this
 //!
 //! Their error list has a `Retry` flag, and it says `true` for
-//! "Email is mandatory". It means *the shopper can correct this and try
+//! "Email is mandatory". It means *the payer can correct this and try
 //! again*, not *this same request may succeed*. Mapping it onto
 //! [`Error::is_retryable`](kasapay_core::Error::is_retryable) would tell a
 //! caller's retry loop to hammer a request that will fail identically forever.
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ const RETRYABLE: &[&str] = &[
 
 /// The bank understood and said no.
 ///
-/// A caller shows these to the shopper: try another card, ring your bank. They
-/// are not a fault in the request, and telling a shopper their details were
+/// A caller shows these to the payer: try another card, ring your bank. They
+/// are not a fault in the request, and telling a payer their details were
 /// invalid when their limit was exceeded sends them round a loop that cannot end.
 const DECLINED: &[&str] = &[
     "10034", // FRAUD_SUSPECT
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ mod tests {
 
     #[test]
     fn a_declined_card_is_a_decline_and_not_a_bad_request() {
-        // 10051 is NOT_SUFFICIENT_FUNDS. Telling a shopper their details were
+        // 10051 is NOT_SUFFICIENT_FUNDS. Telling a payer their details were
         // invalid sends them round a loop that cannot end.
         let kind = kind_for(Some("10051"), ErrorKind::InvalidRequest);
         assert_eq!(kind, ErrorKind::Declined);

crates/kasapay-iyzico/src/reporting/client.rs

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ pub struct PaymentDetail {
     /// two cannot be the same field.
     pub payment_status: Option<PaymentStatus>,
     /// How much of it has been refunded.
-    pub refund_status: Option<RefundStatus>,
+    pub refund_status: Option<PaymentRefundStatus>,
     /// The basket total.
     pub price: Option<Money>,
     /// What was actually collected.
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ impl PaymentDetail {
             refund_status: item
                 .payment_refund_status
                 .as_deref()
-                .map(RefundStatus::from),
+                .map(PaymentRefundStatus::from),
             price: money(item.price.as_deref(), currency),
             paid_price: money(item.paid_price.as_deref(), currency),
             installment: item.installment,
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ impl From<i64> for PaymentStatus {
 /// runs anywhere else. This is that fact, kept as its own field.
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
 #[non_exhaustive]
-pub enum RefundStatus {
+pub enum PaymentRefundStatus {
     /// Nothing has been refunded.
     NotRefunded,
     /// Part of the payment has been refunded.
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ pub enum RefundStatus {
     Other(Box<str>),
 }
 
-impl RefundStatus {
+impl PaymentRefundStatus {
     /// The word iyzico uses on the wire.
     #[must_use]
     pub fn as_str(&self) -> &str {
@@ -783,13 +783,13 @@ impl RefundStatus {
     }
 }
 
-impl fmt::Display for RefundStatus {
+impl fmt::Display for PaymentRefundStatus {
     fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
         f.write_str(self.as_str())
     }
 }
 
-impl From<&str> for RefundStatus {
+impl From<&str> for PaymentRefundStatus {
     fn from(value: &str) -> Self {
         match value {
             "NOT_REFUNDED" => Self::NotRefunded,
@@ -905,8 +905,8 @@ fn money(value: Option<&str>, currency: Option<Currency>) -> Option<Money> {
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
     use super::{
-        PaymentQuery, PaymentStatus, RefundStatus, TransactionApprovalStatus, TransactionType,
-        money, query_value,
+        PaymentQuery, PaymentRefundStatus, PaymentStatus, TransactionApprovalStatus,
+        TransactionType, money, query_value,
     };
     use kasapay_core::{Currency, Money};
 
@@ -971,11 +971,11 @@ mod tests {
     #[test]
     fn the_words_iyzico_uses_round_trip_and_the_rest_are_kept() {
         for name in ["NOT_REFUNDED", "PARTIALLY_REFUNDED", "TOTALLY_REFUNDED"] {
-            assert_eq!(RefundStatus::from(name).to_string(), name);
+            assert_eq!(PaymentRefundStatus::from(name).to_string(), name);
         }
         assert_eq!(
-            RefundStatus::from("WRITTEN_OFF"),
-            RefundStatus::Other("WRITTEN_OFF".into())
+            PaymentRefundStatus::from("WRITTEN_OFF"),
+            PaymentRefundStatus::Other("WRITTEN_OFF".into())
         );
         for name in ["CANCEL", "PAYMENT", "REFUND"] {
             assert_eq!(TransactionType::from(name).to_string(), name);

crates/kasapay-iyzico/src/reporting/mod.rs

@@ -78,6 +78,6 @@ mod wire;
 #[doc(inline)]
 pub use crate::reporting::client::{
     Cancel, Client, ConvertedPayout, DailyTransactionItem, DailyTransactions, ItemTransaction,
-    PaymentDetail, PaymentQuery, PaymentStatus, Refund, RefundStatus, TransactionApprovalStatus,
-    TransactionType,
+    PaymentDetail, PaymentQuery, PaymentRefundStatus, PaymentStatus, Refund,
+    TransactionApprovalStatus, TransactionType,
 };

crates/kasapay-iyzico/src/terminal/mod.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 //! iyzico's Terminal API — a cash register driving a physical POS device.
 //!
-//! Nothing else in this crate looks like this. There is no shopper with a
+//! Nothing else in this crate looks like this. There is no payer with a
 //! browser and no callback address: a till sends a request, a person standing
 //! at a counter presents a card to a terminal named by `deviceUniqueId`, and
 //! the answer to that same request says whether the bank approved it. iyzico

crates/kasapay-stripe/tests/payment_intent.rs

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ async fn a_refused_card_becomes_a_decline() {
 
     assert_eq!(error.kind(), ErrorKind::Declined);
     assert!(!error.is_retryable());
-    // The specific reason, which is what a shop shows the shopper — not the
+    // The specific reason, which is what a shop shows the payer — not the
     // general `card_declined`.
     assert_eq!(error.code(), Some("insufficient_funds"));
     // Stripe's own sentence, not a Debug dump of their error struct.