Skip to content

ci: run plcc-ng release check nightly instead of weekly - #15

Merged
StoneyJackson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/nightly-plcc-ng-check
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

StoneyJackson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/nightly-plcc-ng-check

Conversation

@StoneyJackson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Faster turnaround between an upstream plcc-ng release and the automated bump PR; the check is a cheap PyPI GET that exits immediately when nothing changed, so daily polling costs nothing extra.

Faster turnaround between an upstream plcc-ng release and the automated
bump PR; the check is a cheap PyPI GET that exits immediately when
nothing changed, so daily polling costs nothing extra.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 17, 2026 00:31
@StoneyJackson
StoneyJackson merged commit 0b09843 into main Sep 17, 2026
7 checks passed
@StoneyJackson
StoneyJackson deleted the ci/nightly-plcc-ng-check branch September 17, 2026 00:31

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The changes are small, consistent with the PR description, and limited to a schedule tweak plus corresponding documentation updates.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the automated “plcc-ng release check” workflow cadence from weekly to daily to reduce latency between upstream plcc-ng releases and the repo’s bump PR.

Changes:

  • Switch check-plcc-ng-release.yml GitHub Actions schedule from Mondays to daily at 09:00 UTC.
  • Update maintainer documentation to reflect the new nightly/daily cadence.
File summaries
File Description
docs/maintainer-guide.md Updates maintainer guidance to describe the nightly (daily) bump workflow.
.github/workflows/check-plcc-ng-release.yml Changes the cron schedule to run the release check every day at 09:00 UTC.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants