CNF-26666: Fix wrong compare logic for different configuration files - #917
CNF-26666: Fix wrong compare logic for different configuration files#917bborbely-rh wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bborbely-rh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Hi @bborbely-rh. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift-kni member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@bborbely-rh: This pull request references CNF-26666 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Summary
release-4.22hasKeyfor optional boolean fields so explicitfalsevalues are not treated as unsetFiles
telco-core/.../metallb/addr-pool.yaml(autoAssign,avoidBuggyIPs)telco-core/.../metallb/bfd-profile.yaml(echoMode)telco-core/.../metallb/bgp-peer.yaml(disableMP)telco-hub/.../acm/acmProvisioning.yaml(disableVirtualMediaTLS)Test plan
kubectl-cluster_comparewith fixture CRs usingfalsefor the affected boolean fields reportsCRs with diffs: 0Made with Cursor