Skip to content

Proposal: Develop a uniform naming convention #41

Description

@Lampese

The existing Pull requests are slightly different from the existing code in the core repository in terms of function names and test names. Is it necessary to develop a unified standard to manage?

Activity

  1. fantix commented on Mar 10, 2024

    @fantix
    Contributor

    As well as doc strings.

    I would +1 to an overall style guideline in addition to the current CONTRIBUTING tutorial. However, I also understand that things are still moving fast at this early stage and perhaps a loose standard is preferred.

  2. Lampese commented on Mar 11, 2024

    @Lampese
    ContributorAuthor

    As well as doc strings.

    I would +1 to an overall style guideline in addition to the current CONTRIBUTING tutorial. However, I also understand that things are still moving fast at this early stage and perhaps a loose standard is preferred.

    Maybe you're right, we may have to wait a while to unify these things. This way we can maximize our productivity.

  3. i-shm commented on Mar 12, 2024

    @i-shm
    Contributor

    If it is a simple restriction identifier style (such as snake_case or CamelCase), it should not have any impact. The current overall code style is snake_case.

  4. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Mar 28, 2024
  5. converted this issue into a discussion #143 on Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions