test(plan): cover chained rename table (#24499) - #26599
Conversation
Qodo reviews are paused for this user.Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more → On a Teams plan? Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center? |
XuPeng-SH
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Deep-reviewed at 8e24bdf. The planner unit test exercises the exact chained-rename source resolution from #24499, while the BVT verifies that the row survives through t1 -> t2 -> t3. Existing cases continue to cover conflicts and atomic multi-rename behavior. Focused race test (5x), package build check, vet, and CI all pass.
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 1 hour 8 minutes 5 seconds in the queue, with no time running CI. Waiting for any of
All conditions
ReasonThe merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks Failing checks: HintYou may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again. Requeued — the merge queue status continues in this comment ↓. |
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 1 hour 37 minutes 36 seconds in the queue, including 50 minutes 22 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
|
What type of PR is this?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
issue #24499
What this PR does / why we need it:
test(plan): cover chained rename table