-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
Fix/ptp test change test cases #1773
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sb-lxn
wants to merge
2
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
fix/ptpTestChangeTestCases
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+16
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
In DepthAI, isdai::DeviceInfo::getXLinkDeviceDesc().nameguaranteed to be unique across simultaneously connected devices? If not, which identifier is guaranteed unique for device identity in tests (for examplegetDeviceId()or MXID)?💡 Result:
No, dai::DeviceInfo::getXLinkDeviceDesc.name is not guaranteed to be unique across simultaneously connected devices. The name field in DeviceInfo (populated from XLink's deviceDesc_t.name via the DeviceInfo constructor) represents connection-specific identifiers like USB port paths (e.g., '1.3') or IP addresses (e.g., '192.168.33.201'), which are not unique—multiple devices can share USB hubs/ports or IPs in different scenarios. Official examples show different devices with unique names but emphasize MxId uniqueness. Device::getDeviceName is also unpredictable per GitHub issues. The identifier guaranteed unique for device identity is the MXID (Myriad X ID), accessed via DeviceInfo::getMxId or info.mxid. Official docs explicitly call it the "Unique Mx (chip) identification code", used to distinguish devices in multi-device setups (e.g., XLinkConnection::getDeviceByMxId(mxId)). Examples list distinct MXIDs like '18443010D116631200' for different devices. getDeviceId appears as an alias for MXID in some docs.
Citations:
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: luxonis/depthai-core
Length of output: 1160
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: luxonis/depthai-core
Length of output: 1415
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: luxonis/depthai-core
Length of output: 204
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: luxonis/depthai-core
Length of output: 370
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: luxonis/depthai-core
Length of output: 1590
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: luxonis/depthai-core
Length of output: 1676
Change PTP master selection to use a guaranteed-unique device identifier.
At lines 211–214, the PTP master device is selected and compared using
name, which is derived fromdeviceInfo.getXLinkDeviceDesc().name. This value is not guaranteed to be unique across simultaneously connected devices. The verified unique identifier for device identity in DepthAI is the MXID, accessible viadeviceInfo.getDeviceId(). Multiple devices sharing the same name could be misclassified as the master, breaking PTP synchronization.Additionally, the
slaveQueuesmap is also keyed by the same non-uniquenameidentifier. For a complete fix, consider updating the source wherenameis derived (around line 271) to usegetDeviceId()instead, which would consistently fix bothptpMasterDeviceNameand the slave queue organization throughout this function.Suggested approach
Change the source identifier to the unique device ID:
This single change will ensure both PTP master selection and device queue organization use the guaranteed-unique identifier.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents