This repository was archived by the owner on May 6, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add support for generic API extensions#115
Merged
Merged
Conversation
pmorie
force-pushed
the
generic-actions
branch
3 times, most recently
from
March 21, 2018 14:23
95d8b11 to
f5b3bec
Compare
Contributor
|
Awesome. 👍 |
| // endpoint(s) can be local to the Service Broker or on a remote server. If | ||
| // local to the Service Broker the same authentication method for normal | ||
| // Serivce Broker calls MUST be used. | ||
| DiscoveryURL string `json:"discovery_url,omitmpty"` |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
typo with omitempty
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP, so far has raised a couple questions for cloudfoundry/servicebroker#431