[GSoC 2026] docs(chatbot): document the job verdict - #70
Open
berardifra wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Updated: the quick actions screenshot is refreshed in this PR too, so point 2 of the description is done. Only the version marker question is left. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to intelowlproject/IntelOwl#3898, which is merged into
develop: the chatbot now reportsIntelOwl's own reconciled verdict on a job, and the chatbot page did not describe it.
What changes
capability rather than a detail of the summary.
into a single "Summarize & evaluate", because both now reach the same tool and returned the
same answer. The listed chips were stale.
when there is none.
Emphasis
The section is explicit that the verdict is not the model's own judgement: it is the platform's
reconciliation of the analyzer data models, the same evaluation the job page badge shows. That
distinction is the whole point of the feature, so it seemed worth stating rather than implying.
It also documents the honest-absence behaviour — no evaluation, or a
genericobservable, isreported as such instead of being guessed.
Two things to confirm
_Available from version >= X_markers. I did not add one tothe new section because the release that will carry #3898 is not decided yet (
developis stillat 6.7.0). Tell me the target version and I will add it.
static/chatbot/quick_actions.pngstill shows the four old job chips. The textis now correct, the image is not. I can regenerate it if you want it in this PR, otherwise it can
follow when the next release screenshots are refreshed.