Skip to content

[205] UseFetchTypeLazyRule - #48

Closed
AndreBraga1 wants to merge 1 commit into
green-code-initiative:mainfrom
AndreBraga1:205-Java
Closed

[205] UseFetchTypeLazyRule#48
AndreBraga1 wants to merge 1 commit into
green-code-initiative:mainfrom
AndreBraga1:205-Java

Conversation

@AndreBraga1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@AndreBraga1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Échanger avec David durant le challenge ecoCode, on garde le numéro (EC205) pour la règle CRJVM205

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has no activity for 30 days.
Please add a comment if you want to keep the issue open. Thank you for your contributions!

@dedece35

dedece35 commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @AndreBraga1

several PR have worked on this same subject (FetchType Lazy instead of Eager for OneToMany et ManyToMany relations).

After worked on a complete analysis to check if this rule is relevant :

  • first, I found that the rule already exists in SonarQube as a built-in rule : S6904
  • secondly, no proof was found to check relevancy
  • thirdly, I decided to launch an analysis with EnergyTracer tool which can do real measures

Thus I created a new PR to :

  • add this analysis
  • clean all old references to this same subject

Here is the PR : green-code-initiative/creedengo-rules-specifications#487

Sorry, but I have to close this PR.
thank you for the work.

@dedece35 dedece35 closed this Aug 7, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Review in progress to Done in Hackathon Kanban - JAVA Aug 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants