WIP repeatmasker: bump and dfam data table - #6845
Closed
bernt-matthias wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Repeatmasker (in containers) is broken since version 4.1.5 build 1 since the [download of the repeat libraries has been removed](bioconda/bioconda-recipes#43288) ([see also](bioconda/bioconda-recipes#45513)). This provides dfam data via a data table
bernt-matthias
marked this pull request as draft
March 15, 2025 17:21
bernt-matthias
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
Created an upstream issue Dfam-consortium/RepeatMasker#378 |
Contributor
Author
|
Superseded #8215 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Repeatmasker (in containers) is broken since version 4.1.5 build 1 since the download of the repeat libraries has been
removed (see also).
This provides dfam data via a data table. Should also be usable in tools like maker.
Should we remove this:
In particular the instructions in the second part make sone sense in containers.
TODO:
FOR CONTRIBUTOR: