Skip to content

pipeline: podman metrics: document exclude_name_regex option#2604

Open
stondo wants to merge 1 commit into
fluent:masterfrom
stondo:add-podman-exclude-name-regex
Open

pipeline: podman metrics: document exclude_name_regex option#2604
stondo wants to merge 1 commit into
fluent:masterfrom
stondo:add-podman-exclude-name-regex

Conversation

@stondo

@stondo stondo commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Documents the new exclude_name_regex configuration option for the
in_podman_metrics (Podman metrics) input plugin.

Companion to the code change in fluent/fluent-bit#11970.

The option skips containers whose name matches a user-supplied regular
expression before their metrics are collected, for example
exclude_name_regex '-(infra|service)$' to skip Podman pod infrastructure
(pause / catatonit) containers. It defaults to unset, so existing behaviour
(collect every container) is unchanged.

Change

Adds an exclude_name_regex row to the Configuration parameters table in
pipeline/inputs/podman-metrics.md.


Signed-off-by: Stefano Tondo stondo@gmail.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added configuration parameter to exclude containers by name using regular expression patterns before metrics collection. When unset, all containers are included.
  • Documentation

    • Updated Podman metrics input documentation with new container exclusion option details.

@stondo stondo requested review from a team and eschabell as code owners June 19, 2026 22:47
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@eschabell, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 48 minutes and 23 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fea456ba-a307-4d15-a242-fb445aad639d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 424425a and 89a346b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pipeline/inputs/podman-metrics.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single row is added to the configuration parameters table in pipeline/inputs/podman-metrics.md, documenting the exclude_name_regex option that filters containers by name via regex before metrics collection, with a default of _none_.

Changes

Podman Metrics Input Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Document exclude_name_regex config parameter
pipeline/inputs/podman-metrics.md
Adds a table row for exclude_name_regex, describing its regex-based pre-collection container name exclusion and its default value of _none_.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐇 A regex row, so small and neat,
Tucked into the table, tidy and fleet.
Exclude by name before you collect,
With _none_ as default — perfect, correct!
The docs hop forward, one line at a time~ 🌿

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding documentation for the exclude_name_regex option to the Podman metrics input configuration.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

  - Document the new exclude_name_regex configuration option for the
    in_podman_metrics input plugin
  - Reword exclude_name_regex description

Signed-off-by: Stefano Tondo <stondo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric D. Schabell <eric@schabell.org>
@eschabell eschabell force-pushed the add-podman-exclude-name-regex branch from 424425a to 89a346b Compare June 27, 2026 11:43

@eschabell eschabell left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stondo fixed a lint issue, but now ready to go, thanks for the doc PR! Waiting only on code PR merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants