Skip to content

docs: update obsolete RFC citations to RFC 9110, 9111, and 9112 - #2716

Open
vidurdvr wants to merge 1 commit into
falconry:masterfrom
vidurdvr:fix-2525-obsolete-rfc-refs
Open

docs: update obsolete RFC citations to RFC 9110, 9111, and 9112#2716
vidurdvr wants to merge 1 commit into
falconry:masterfrom
vidurdvr:fix-2525-obsolete-rfc-refs

Conversation

@vidurdvr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Replace this text with a high-level summary of the changes included in this PR.

Related Issues

Please reference here any issue #'s that are relevant to this PR, or simply enter "N/A" if this PR does not relate to any existing issues.

Pull Request Checklist

This is just a reminder about the most common mistakes. Please make sure that you tick all appropriate boxes. Reading our contribution guide at least once will save you a few review cycles!

If an item doesn't apply to your pull request, check it anyway to make it apparent that there's nothing to do.

  • Applied changes to both WSGI and ASGI code paths and interfaces (where applicable).
  • Added tests for changed code.
  • Performed automated tests and code quality checks by running tox.
  • Prefixed code comments with GitHub nick and an appropriate prefix.
  • Coding style is consistent with the rest of the framework.
  • Updated documentation for changed code.
    • Added docstrings for any new classes, functions, or modules.
    • Updated docstrings for any modifications to existing code.
    • Updated both WSGI and ASGI docs (where applicable).
    • Added references to new classes, functions, or modules to the relevant RST file under docs/.
    • Updated all relevant supporting documentation files under docs/.
    • A copyright notice is included at the top of any new modules (using your own name or the name of your organization).
    • Changed/added classes/methods/functions have appropriate versionadded, versionchanged, or deprecated directives.
  • Changes (and possible deprecations) have towncrier news fragments under docs/_newsfragments/, with the file name format {issue_number}.{fragment_type}.rst. (Run tox -e docs, and inspect docs/_build/html/changes/ in the browser to ensure it renders correctly.)
  • LLM output, if any, has been carefully reviewed and tested by a human developer. (See also: Use of LLMs ("AI").)

If you have any questions to any of the points above, just submit and ask! This checklist is here to help you, not to deter you from contributing!

PR template inspired by the attrs project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant