Repository navigation
Fix more format specifiers - #1330
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… by the use of egg_snprintf() and simple_sprintf() / use snprintf() for all getudef()
Member
|
lgtm |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found by: michaelortmann
Patch by: michaelortmann
Fixes:
One-line summary:
Fix format specifier for intptr_t with c99 PRIdPTR that were shadowed by the use of egg_snprintf() and simple_sprintf() / use snprintf() for all getudef()
Additional description (if needed):
This PR is also a continuation of fe00c1e
This PR will also solve part of #1028
Test cases demonstrating functionality (if applicable):