Repository navigation
Conversation
…d record where the submission stands The doc still described the portal, the submitter requirement and the review model as they were on 2026-07-31. Re-verified against the official pages on 2026-10-23: the portal is now claude.ai/directory/manage, anyone on a paid Claude plan can submit, the status model for MCP connectors is Draft / In review / Changes requested / Not approved / Approved / Published (editing an Approved listing before publication returns it to Draft), a Verified review runs a functional test of each tool, and escalations to mcp-review should name the listing, the submitting organization and the status the portal shows. The test-credentials criterion is quoted in its current wording. A new "Submission log" near the top records the state: submitted 2026-09-28 as "Internet Computer" (slug internet-computer), In review since with no reviewer feedback as of 2026-10-23; the 2026-07-31 pre-submission email got only an automated acknowledgement (ticket #120537913) and its question is moot now that the funding tools are gone and ledger methods are refused; and the submission date fell inside the 2026-09-25 to 2026-10-01 OAuth disruption from the DCR-to-CIMD migration, so a reviewer who tried in that window would have failed at sign-in (the fix is live). The submission-day checklist ticks the privacy policy (entered) and the release cut (crates at 0.5.1, v0.5.1 tagged, rc/v scheme from #204 in place); the submitter item now states the paid-plan requirement. Sections that were still accurate are untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
The documentation incorrectly implies v0.5.1 passed the staging-candidate gate, although it was published before that process was introduced for subsequent releases.
1 open issue
What changed in this PR
Updates the Anthropic connector submission guide to reflect current directory requirements and record the Internet Computer listing’s submission status.
Changes:
- Refreshes portal, submitter eligibility, review-status, and testing guidance.
- Adds a submission log covering review progress, the OAuth disruption, and escalation steps.
- Updates blocker notes and the submission-day checklist with recorded progress and release-process context.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
docs/anthropic-directory-submission.md |
Refreshes directory guidance and records submission history and checklist progress. |
Review effort: Balanced
…gh it The checklist's release-cut item described v0.5.1 as released under the rc-*/v* promotion from #204. The tag sits on the 0.5.1 bump (#205), which merged before #204, and #204 names 0.6.0 as the first release cut under the scheme, so 0.5.1 passed no staging-candidate gate. The item now says so and keeps the scheme as what applies from 0.6.0 on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F
#211 (merged 2026-10-27) brought docs/anthropic-directory-submission.md up to the current connector docs and logged the submission with the facts from the portal (name "Internet Computer", slug icp). This branch had done the same work from the same base; its version is dropped in favour of main's, and the one entry main lacks follows in the next commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F
The submission log on main records the 2026-07-31 email and the 2026-09-28 submission but not that the submission date fell inside the 2026-09-25 to 2026-10-01 OAuth disruption from the DCR-to-CIMD migration (a user reported DCR failing with HTTP 400 "redirect URI not permitted" on 2026-09-25; OpenAI's reviewer could not complete the sign-in flow on 2026-10-01). A reviewer who tried in that window would have failed at sign-in, and the fix is live, so the log now says so and what to answer if feedback cites a sign-in failure. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F
The Anthropic MCP Directory team's review email (received 2026-10-28) blocks the listing on one critical issue: the financial guard matches method names only, so update calls named transfer, withdraw and swap passed it and reached the target canister. They ask for value-moving capability to be detected from the canister's own interface (treat a declared canister exposing ICRC-1, ICRC-2 or ICP-ledger interfaces as a ledger and refuse its updates), for common non-standard value methods to be refused, for the server instructions to stop describing the guard as incomplete, and for a reply describing what the guard covers. Everything else passed, and the optional unknown-app suggestion was already addressed by #212. The submission log records all of that and the 2026-09-28 entry no longer claims there was no feedback. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F
… still pending #213 and #214 merged on 2026-10-28: a financial canister is now detected from the interface it publishes, a published and readable interface is required for any update call, and method names carrying a financial keyword are refused everywhere. The submission log says so and lists what still stands between here and the reply on the review thread: the server instructions' "not a complete filter" clause, a release reaching production, and the reviewers' test app publishing its interface. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F
3 of 7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Summary
Follow-up to #211, which brought
docs/anthropic-directory-submission.mdup to Anthropic's current connector docs and logged the 2026-09-28 submission. This PR adds the submission-log entries the doc was meant to carry: that the submission date fell inside an OAuth disruption, the first reviewer feedback (by email on 2026-10-28, blocking the listing on one critical issue), and that the guard change the reviewers asked for has since landed on main, with what still stands between here and the reply.History note: this branch originally did the same doc update as #211 from the same base. After #211 merged, main was merged in taking #211's version of the doc wholesale (its facts are the better ones: the listing's slug is
icp, and the status date is 2026-10-27), so the only changes left against main are the log entries below. Main has been merged in again after #213 and #214, which updated blocker 2's description of the guard.Related issues
Follows #211. References #203 (CIMD became the default registration mode on 2026-09-24, the migration behind the disruption), #212 (which already addressed the reviewers' optional unknown-app suggestion), and #213 / #214 (the guard change the reviewers asked for, merged 2026-10-28).
Changes
transfer,withdrawandswappassed it and reached the target canister; they asked for value-moving capability to be detected from the canister's own interface, for common non-standard value methods to be refused, for the server instructions to stop describing the guard as incomplete, and for a reply describing what the guard covers. Everything else passed, and the optional unknown-app suggestion was already addressed by Ask the user for an unknown app's URL instead of sending the model to a web search #212. The 2026-09-28 entry no longer says there was no feedback.candid:service.Testing
Docs-only change; no Rust or dashboard code touched.
cargo build --locked --all-targets— not applicable (no code change)cargo test --locked --all-targets— not applicable (no code change)cargo fmt --all/cargo clippy --all-targets(tree is warning-free) — not applicable (no code change)npm test --prefix monitoring/mcp-status(if the dashboard changed) — not applicablebash .github/scripts/scan-internal-identifiers.sh origin/main...HEAD— cleangit diff origin/maintouches only the submission log of the one docChecklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ui6YJGczXE8vZv2pjyxX2F