Skip to content

Suggestion: Add option for debug log level in the Misc tab #282

Closed

Description

@wechsler42

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would appreciate an easy way to set the log level of vorta/borg to "debug"

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a checkbox to the Misc tab of vorta:
Set log level to debug (very detailed logging , needs more disk space)

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Suggestion: Add option for debuglog in the Misc tab[/-] [+]Suggestion: Add option for debug log level in the Misc tab[/+] on May 11, 2019
  2. m3nu commented on May 11, 2019

    @m3nu
    Contributor

    Most borg commands are already run with the --debug-option enabled and these debug-messages are written to Vorta's log.

    What information are you missing specifically?

  3. wechsler42 commented on May 13, 2019

    @wechsler42
    Author

    Thanks for the update,, so I did not know this.
    Specifically I was missing some information on the repository check. So it was written that it started but nothing more. After a certain while I was wondering if it is stalled ot still working. When I do a repository check with borg on the CLI then I see there a note about how many percentages of the repository are already checked.

  4. m3nu commented on May 15, 2019

    @m3nu
    Contributor

    There should be some information displayed. We call it with the info log-level:

    ['borg', 'check', '--info', '--log-json']

    Should look like this:

    Screen Shot 2019-05-15 at 14 16 43

  5. wechsler42 commented on May 15, 2019

    @wechsler42
    Author

    Thanks m3nu for the feedback.
    Well, it looks a bit different here (see the screenshot).
    It stays with the message "INFO: Remote: Starting repository check" until the archive check is finished with "INFO: Archive consistency check complete, no problems found."
    vorta_archive_check

  6. m3nu commented on May 15, 2019

    @m3nu
    Contributor

    borg check has 2 parts: repo check and archive check. You are correct, that there is no log output for the first repo check part, only for the second archive check (lists archives).

  7. added
    status:ideaProposed feature, discuss if its useful
    and removed
    type:enhancementImprovement of an existing function
    on May 29, 2020
  8. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Feb 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    status:ideaProposed feature, discuss if its useful

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions