-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
feat: add bounded graph extraction concurrency #370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
nw9663644-eng
wants to merge
8
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
nw9663644-eng:feat-bounded-graph-extract-concurrency
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3719fb3
feat: add bounded graph extraction concurrency
wn12222 fd572e3
fix: address graph extraction concurrency review comments
wn12222 182e1a3
fix: address graph extraction concurrency review comments
wn12222 5e3ac82
fix: restore graph extraction schema filtering
wn12222 fea7c35
fix: preserve graph extraction filter compatibility
wn12222 e80f434
fix: reject malformed graph extraction containers
wn12222 43d9bd6
fix: tighten graph extraction worker validation
wn12222 8f43b44
fix: handle graph extraction concurrency failures deterministically
wn12222 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧹 REST validation coerces some raw inputs before the shared validator can enforce its contract. A direct probe shows
graph_extract_max_workers=trueand"1.0"are both accepted here as integer1, whilevalidate_graph_extract_max_workers()rejects those same raw values. This makes REST behavior inconsistent with the flow/helper entry points and can silently turn malformed input into a valid request. Please add amode="before"field validator (or equivalent strict raw-input validation) that applies the shared rules, and cover boolean and decimal-string request values with regression tests.