Skip to content

add deterministic VSS durability gap tests - #142

Closed
dcorral wants to merge 9 commits into
devfrom
test/vss-durability-gaps
Closed

add deterministic VSS durability gap tests#142
dcorral wants to merge 9 commits into
devfrom
test/vss-durability-gaps

Conversation

@dcorral

@dcorral dcorral commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@dcorral
dcorral force-pushed the test/vss-durability-gaps branch from a070fb8 to f53c71b Compare August 12, 2026 09:16
@dcorral
dcorral force-pushed the test/vss-durability-gaps branch from f53c71b to 629ea6d Compare August 12, 2026 09:31
@Jainakin

Jainakin commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Cherry-picked the deterministic durability test commit into #138 as fdc814c (branch hardik/rln-kv-vss-durability). All three tests pass locally against the durability implementation, and the full PR 138 matrix is running. PR 142 remains useful as the independent red-on-dev / green-with-138 evidence.

@Jainakin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Final follow-up: the three deterministic tests from this PR are in #138, and #138 now also includes a fourth deterministic shutdown-admission regression found during final review. That test proves a retry drain cannot begin remote VSS I/O after stop() returns. The final #138 head passed all 49 required checks, including VSS E2E/restore/re-import, process-kill matrices, AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, SDK E2E, and platform artifacts: https://github.com/UTEXO-Protocol/rgb-lightning-node/pull/138/checks

@dcorral

dcorral commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing this now in favor of #138

@dcorral dcorral closed this Aug 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants