[DRAFT] Merge old and new documentation - #657
Conversation
|
Should we maybe merge that into a branch first? It might be good to review these (old) docs, and a lot might have changed since then... |
|
Can't see the advantage of merging the |
If it's only one PR for the docs consolidation, then yes, that is ok. Is it already complete or are there more sources? |
|
Hm, there's still has a bunch of wrong/outdated/weird things in it. Do you want me to look into this? |
| ## Status | ||
| In the course of the development the project unfortunately split into three branches, mostly due to some very tight deadlines with different requirements. Since early July 2014 there is a joint version, merging the branches of Xavier Dutoit (tttp) and Björn Endres (SYSTOPIA). Both versions have, individually, been used in production environments since the beginning of 2014. | ||
|
|
||
| Maintainer: Björn Endres (endres (at) systopia.de) and Xavier Dutoit (xavier (at) tttp.eu) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can remove Xavier as a maintainer, but he should still be credited for the initial development
|
Only this one |
jensschuppe
added
documentation
status:needs review
4 participants
In this PR @Fabian-SYSTOPIA and I are working on an attempt to merge the old confluence wiki pages into the existing docs pages.
0681e6d currently has some todo comments which need to be resolved before merging!
To make collaboration easier I created this PR to be able to use line-by-line comments
systopia-reference-16162