[16.0][ADD] sale_invoice_plan_report: add new module

[kaynnan]

cc @marcelsavegnago @WesleyOliveira98 @CristianoMafraJunior @alexey-pelykh @rousseldenis

[CristianoMafraJunior]

LGTM

[rousseldenis]

@kaynnan Could you maybe add class and css instead of style ? Thanks

[OCA-git-bot]

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

[alexey-pelykh]

Nice module, @kaynnan — it renders cleanly and the smoke tests in tests/test_report.py cover the main paths (section shown/hidden, advance vs installment, currency marker). One non-blocking observation on views/report_saleorder.xml:

The two summary cards format their totals as plain numbers, e.g.

<t t-esc="'{:,.2f}'.format(sum(line.amount_invoiced if line.invoiced else 0 for line in doc.invoice_plan_ids))"/>

so "Invoiced" and "Pending" render with no currency symbol and hard-coded ,/. separators, whereas the table below correctly uses the monetary widget with the order currency:

<span t-field="plan_line.amount" t-options='{"widget": "monetary", "display_currency": doc.currency_id}'/>

On a non-USD order (or a locale with different separators) the card totals and the table amounts will disagree in formatting. Worth routing the card totals through the monetary widget / doc.currency_id too for consistency.

(+1 to @rousseldenis's point about moving the inline style= to CSS classes — same spirit.)

Co-Reviewed-By: Claude Opus 4.8 noreply@anthropic.com

[rousseldenis]

Code and functional review.

Nice.

[rousseldenis]

@kaynnan Don't hesitate to include screenshots as this will help module adoption and make them better on app store