Skip to content

docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 - #8555

Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
jameslamb:docs-builds
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000#8555
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
jameslamb:docs-builds

Conversation

@jameslamb

@jameslamb jameslamb commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#333

Updates to hopefully reduce how often docs-build jobs get stuck waiting for CI runners.

  • switches those jobs to RTX Pro 6000 runners
  • uses shared docs-build matrix to set job details

@jameslamb jameslamb added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Sep 3, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Cython / Python Cython or Python issue label Sep 10, 2026
@jameslamb
jameslamb changed the base branch from main to release/26.10 September 10, 2026 01:22
uses: rapidsai/shared-workflows/.github/workflows/custom-job.yaml@release/26.10
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix: ${{ fromJSON(needs.docs-build-matrix.outputs.matrix) }}

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jameslamb jameslamb added the DO NOT MERGE Hold off on merging; see PR for details label Sep 10, 2026
@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: [NOT READY FOR REVIEW] docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 Sep 10, 2026
Comment thread .github/workflows/build.yaml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/pr.yaml Outdated
@jameslamb
jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2026 02:35
@jameslamb
jameslamb requested a review from a team as a code owner September 10, 2026 02:35
@jameslamb
jameslamb requested a review from bdice September 10, 2026 02:35
@NVIDIA NVIDIA deleted a comment from copy-pr-bot Bot Sep 10, 2026
@coderabbitai

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

rapids-bot Bot pushed a commit to rapidsai/shared-workflows that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
…O 6000 (#627)

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#333

Introduces a `docs-build` matrix to the `compute-matrix` job, so we can centrally control which runner types are used for docs builds.

## Notes for Reviewers

### Why RTX Pro 6000?

There's less competition for those runners than for L4s, see rapidsai/build-planning#333 for details.

### Why centralize here?

Centralizing that choice of runner type would mean that changing it in the future wouldn't require PRs like NVIDIA/cudf#23878 in every repo. I think that's justified here... it's really unlikely that docs builds would be sensitive to the particular details of a runner, as long as it's a GPU RAPIDS supports.

## Notes for reviewers

### How I tested this

Saw passing builds and the expected behavior on all of these:

* rapidsai/cucim#1156
* rapidsai/cugraph-docs#229
* NVIDIA/cuml#8555

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

Approvers:
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)

URL: #627
@jameslamb

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jameslamb
jameslamb changed the base branch from release/26.10 to main September 10, 2026 13:38
@jameslamb
jameslamb marked this pull request as draft September 10, 2026 13:38
@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 WIP: docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 Sep 10, 2026
@jameslamb jameslamb removed the DO NOT MERGE Hold off on merging; see PR for details label Sep 10, 2026
@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 docs-build: switch to RTX Pro 6000 Sep 10, 2026
@jameslamb
jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2026 15:08
@NVIDIA NVIDIA deleted a comment from copy-pr-bot Bot Sep 10, 2026
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@NVIDIA NVIDIA deleted a comment from coderabbitai Bot Sep 10, 2026
@jameslamb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot merged commit c607d02 into NVIDIA:main Sep 11, 2026
109 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Cython / Python Cython or Python issue improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants