Skip to content

chore(runway): cherry-pick fix: now tab - ordering regression cp-8.2.0#32903

Open
runway-github[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
release/8.2.0from
runway-cherry-pick-8.2.0-1783438775
Open

chore(runway): cherry-pick fix: now tab - ordering regression cp-8.2.0#32903
runway-github[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
release/8.2.0from
runway-cherry-pick-8.2.0-1783438775

Conversation

@runway-github

@runway-github runway-github Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

UI regression.

The Explore > "Now Tab" order was decided here
ASSETS-3405
/ #31993

However this change unintended re-introduced the ordering:
#32561

This PR re-applies changes on
#31993, with tests

Changelog

CHANGELOG entry: fix: now tab - ordering regression cp-8.2.0

Related issues

Fixes: #32897

Manual testing steps

Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Performance checks (if applicable)

  • I've tested on Android
    • Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
  • I've tested with a power user scenario
  • Use these power-user
    SRPs

    to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
  • I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
    performance metrics
  • See trace() for usage and
    addToken
    for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the Performance
Guide
.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
    app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
    in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
    as recordings and or screenshots.

Note

Low Risk
UI-only section ordering on Explore Now; no auth, data, or API
changes.

Overview
Fixes an Explore Now tab layout regression by dropping the Whats
Happening vs Predictions
A/B ordering experiment from NowTab and
using a single, fixed section stack again.

Predictions stays at the top when shown, followed by crypto
movers
, perps, then What's Happening (after perps, before
stocks). The useABTest hook and whatsHappeningBeforePredict
branching are removed from section assembly.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit
11d1ed3. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
here.

[6fcb533](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/commit/6fcb533433150bde259b76fac05dab6fd06d5f7d)

#32895)

## **Description**

UI regression.

The Explore > "Now Tab" order was decided here
[ASSETS-3405](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/ASSETS-3405)
/ #31993

However this change unintended re-introduced the ordering:
#32561

This PR re-applies changes on
#31993, with tests

## **Changelog**

<!-- mms-check: type=changelog required=true blocking=true -->

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry: fix: now tab - ordering regression cp-8.2.0

## **Related issues**

<!-- mms-check: type=issue-link required=true -->

Fixes: #32897

## **Manual testing steps**

<!-- mms-check: type=manual-testing required=true -->

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- mms-check: type=screenshot required=true -->

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

<!-- mms-check: type=checklist required=true -->

<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.

Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->

- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [x] I've tested on Android
  - Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [x] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [x] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.


[ASSETS-3405]:
https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/ASSETS-3405?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> UI-only section ordering on Explore Now; no auth, data, or API
changes.
> 
> **Overview**
> Fixes an Explore **Now** tab layout regression by dropping the **Whats
Happening vs Predictions** A/B ordering experiment from `NowTab` and
using a single, fixed section stack again.
> 
> **Predictions** stays at the top when shown, followed by **crypto
movers**, **perps**, then **What's Happening** (after perps, before
**stocks**). The `useABTest` hook and `whatsHappeningBeforePredict`
branching are removed from section assembly.
> 
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
11d1ed3. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@mm-token-exchange-service mm-token-exchange-service Bot added the team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.) label Jul 7, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Smart E2E Test Selection

⏭️ Smart E2E selection skipped - PR targets a release or stable branch (release/* or stable)

All E2E tests pre-selected.

View GitHub Actions results

@github-actions github-actions Bot added size-S risk:low AI analysis: low risk labels Jul 7, 2026
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

risk:low AI analysis: low risk size-S team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant