Skip to content

Describe the EHR participant history filter client-side metric - #1232

Open
labkey-jeckels wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
fb_metric_descriptions
Open

labkey-jeckels wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
fb_metric_descriptions

Conversation

@labkey-jeckels

@labkey-jeckels labkey-jeckels commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@labkey-jeckels labkey-jeckels self-assigned this Oct 25, 2026
@labkey-jeckels
labkey-jeckels marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2026 22:17

@labkey-bpatel labkey-bpatel left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, but please review my comment.

@Override
protected void doStartupAfterSpringConfig(ModuleContext moduleContext)
{
SimpleMetricsService.get().describeClientSideFeatureArea("ehrParticipantHistoryFilter", "Participant history filter use, by filter type: aliveAtCenter or all when a user switches to that filter, idSearch for each completed ID lookup, including ones that match no IDs");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested rewording : "Participant History filter usage by type: Alive at Center, All, or completed ID search, including searches with no matching IDs"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have a strong preference about how these are captured, but aliveAtCenter and idSearch are the terms that will actually show up in metric names, so it seemed useful to capture them in a way that helps guide querying more directly. Let me know if that makes sense to you, or if you still prefer the suggested wording.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants