Skip to content

test: Enhance unit test coverage for processCommitTimestamps edge cases - #8760

Open
tmdeveloper007 wants to merge 1 commit into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
tmdeveloper007:test/8682-coverage
Open

test: Enhance unit test coverage for processCommitTimestamps edge cases#8760
tmdeveloper007 wants to merge 1 commit into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
tmdeveloper007:test/8682-coverage

Conversation

@tmdeveloper007

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Added unit tests for processCommitTimestamps in utils/dateHelpers.test.ts covering invalid date handling and NaN detection.

Pillar

  • Other (Bug fix, refactoring, docs)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits format.

Note

Please assign this PR to the tmdeveloper007 account.

Closes #8758

@retenta-bot

retenta-bot Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is a great addition as it enhances the test coverage for the processCommitTimestamps function, ensuring that edge cases are handled properly. It aligns well with previous decisions made to handle invalid dates and prevent NaN values from affecting metrics. Thank you for your contribution, and happy coding!

@retenta-bot retenta-bot Bot changed the title test : add unit test coverage for processCommitTimestamps edge cases test: Enhance unit test coverage for processCommitTimestamps edge cases Aug 4, 2026
@Aamod007 Aamod007 added level:beginner Small changes Usually isolated fixes or simple UI/text updates. quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:testing Adding, updating, or fixing tests mentor:Aamod007 labels Aug 6, 2026

@Aamod007 Aamod007 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work expanding the unit test coverage for \processCommitTimestamps\ in \utils/dateHelpers.test.ts! The edge cases you added—such as empty arrays, null/undefined inputs, and entirely invalid date strings—are essential for ensuring the function doesn't crash on bad data. The tests are well-structured. Approved!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

level:beginner Small changes Usually isolated fixes or simple UI/text updates. mentor:Aamod007 quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:testing Adding, updating, or fixing tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test : add unit test coverage for processCommitTimestamps edge cases

2 participants