Skip to content

reposurgeon: update checksum for 5.9 release#294229

Open
stefanb wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
reposurgeon-update-checksum-for-5.9-release
Open

reposurgeon: update checksum for 5.9 release#294229
stefanb wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
reposurgeon-update-checksum-for-5.9-release

Conversation

@stefanb

@stefanb stefanb commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref:


  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

  • AI was used to generate or assist with generating this PR. Please specify below how you used AI to help you, and what steps you have taken to manually verify the changes.

@stefanb stefanb added the checksum mismatch SHA-256 doesn't match the download label Jul 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added go Go use is a significant feature of the PR or issue ruby Ruby use is a significant feature of the PR or issue labels Jul 20, 2026
@stefanb stefanb added the help wanted Task(s) needing PRs from the community or maintainers label Jul 20, 2026
@daeho-ro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

checksum mismatch SHA-256 doesn't match the download go Go use is a significant feature of the PR or issue help wanted Task(s) needing PRs from the community or maintainers ruby Ruby use is a significant feature of the PR or issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants