Create ergoplatform-ergo-1905.json (reservation, 500 SigUSD)

[Ergologica]

Type

• Bounty submission or reservation
• Automation/code change
• Generated data update
• Documentation

Submission Checklist

• One submissions/*.json file changed
• contributor matches PR author
• wallet_address is real, not placeholder
• status is one of in-progress, awaiting-review, reviewed, paid
• Completed claims use a GitHub PR URL in work_link
• Completed claims link merged upstream work — upstream PR is open, not merged yet
• Paid claims include payment_tx_id and payment_date

Notes

Reservation for ergoplatform/ergo#1905 — /wallet/payment/send is trying to spend custom scan boxes (500 SigUSD).

Work submitted upstream as ergo#2451 (open, awaiting review): OffChainRegistry.offChainBoxes holds the unconfirmed boxes of all scans, so boxes tracked only by an external application scan were spendable by wallet transactions. A new walletOffChainBoxes (payments scan only) is now used by getBoxesToSpend and getWalletBoxes, while the scan APIs keep seeing their own unconfirmed boxes. Covered by a new property in ErgoWalletServiceSpec.

Will switch this submission to awaiting-review once the upstream PR is merged.

[github-actions]

Submission triage

• Create ergoplatform-ergo-1905.json (reservation, 500 SigUSD) #48 needs attention: Create ergoplatform-ergo-1905.json (reservation, 500 SigUSD)
  • submissions/ergoplatform-ergo-1905.json: duplicate bounty claim also open in PR(s): [WIP] Bounty ergoplatform/ergo#1905 - Prevent custom-scan boxes from being spent #43

Closing: submission has blocking validation failures.

[Ergologica]

On the duplicate flag: I opened this after implementing and submitting the fix upstream, and I had not noticed #43 — apologies to @beejaygee for the overlap.

For the maintainers' benefit, the current state as I see it: #43 is a WIP reservation from 2026-07-17 with no upstream pull request against ergoplatform/ergo so far, while the implementation for this issue is already submitted and public in ergo#2451 (production fix plus a regression test in ErgoWalletServiceSpec).

I'm happy to defer to whatever the maintainers consider fair here — if @beejaygee has work in progress, they should feel free to take it; my patch stays available upstream to be reviewed on its merits either way.