Skip to content

docs: add ServiceDesk Plus to the Pro Integrations tool reference#15217

Open
devGregA wants to merge 1 commit into
DefectDojo:bugfixfrom
devGregA:sc-13651_servicedeskplus_docs
Open

docs: add ServiceDesk Plus to the Pro Integrations tool reference#15217
devGregA wants to merge 1 commit into
DefectDojo:bugfixfrom
devGregA:sc-13651_servicedeskplus_docs

Conversation

@devGregA

@devGregA devGregA commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus to the Pro Integrations documentation:

  • integrations.md: lists ServiceDesk Plus among the supported integrations.
  • integrations_toolreference.md: new ServiceDesk Plus section covering both editions — on-premises setup with a technician key, and cloud setup with a Zoho OAuth self-client walkthrough (scope, code exchange curl, regional token endpoints) — plus the support-group mapping identifier, priority/status name mappings, and the SDP-specific behaviors (full content sync on update, close-on-delete, mandatory-on-closure caveat).

Documents the feature shipping via DefectDojo-Inc/dojo-pro#1827 and DefectDojo-Inc/go-integrators#180 (Shortcut sc-13651). Note: #15210 and #15215 (PagerDuty/Zendesk docs) touch the same two files; later-merging PRs have a trivial list-line conflict.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Covers both editions (on-premises technician key and cloud Zoho OAuth
with the self-client walkthrough and regional token endpoints), the
group-name mapping identifier, priority/status name mappings, and the
SDP-specific behaviors (full content sync on update, close-on-delete,
mandatory-on-closure caveat).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Maffooch Maffooch force-pushed the sc-13651_servicedeskplus_docs branch from 189702c to 3820ab6 Compare July 10, 2026 22:11
@Maffooch Maffooch changed the base branch from dev to bugfix July 10, 2026 22:11
@Maffooch Maffooch requested a review from blakeaowens July 10, 2026 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants