chore: sync upstream PR #8366 - fix(android): implement automatic edge-to-edge and universal keyboard handling by riderx · Pull Request #94 · Cap-go/capacitor-plus

riderx · 2026-07-14T06:40:36Z

Merge Conflict Review Required

The sync of upstream PR ionic-team#8366 from @fabiomartino encountered merge conflicts.

What happened

Git applied the upstream-preferred merge strategy
This PR requires CI and manual review before merging

Synced from upstream by Capacitor+ Bot

… handling

…iew support - Add cachedWebViewMajorVersion field to avoid repeated WebView version lookups - Add handleOnResume() override to refresh insets on app resume - Add WindowCompat.setDecorFitsSystemWindows() calls in load(), handleOnResume(), and onDOMReady() - Add null check in setStyle() PluginMethod for safer style parameter handling - Preserve backup's applyInsets() implementation with legacy WebView compatibility - Add setViewMargins() and resetViewBottomMargin() for legacy WebView workaround - Use MIN_INSETS_VERSION (LOLLIPOP) instead of VANILLA_ICE_CREAM for broader SDK support - Use INSETS_HANDLING_CSS constant instead of hardcoded string literal - Remove unused setViewBottomMargin() and getBottomInset() methods - Rename viewportMetaJSFunction to VIEWPORT_META_JS constant Fixes edge-to-edge display issues on devices with various WebView versions.

…edge

…lder Android - Add support for API 21-34 by using LOLLIPOP instead of VANILLA_ICE_CREAM - Add legacy fallback for WebView < 140 on Android API < 30 that forces CSS safe-area vars to 0 to prevent double compensation in footer/tab-bar layouts - Preserve original legacy IME margins behavior for Android 11+ (API 30-33) - Fixes ionic-team#8394: CSS safe-area-inset-x not being applied on Android API <= 34

Scope legacy fallback to Android API < 30 and force zero CSS safe-area vars in that path to prevent double compensation on top/bottom bars, while preserving behavior on newer API levels.

Keep top safe-area inset at 0 for Android API < 30 (legacy and modern WebView paths), preserve semantic bottom inset handling, and prevent malformed safe-area CSS custom properties from persisting across keyboard/lifecycle transitions. Se vuoi una versione con riferimento issue: fix(android): stabilize safe-area CSS behavior on API < 30 (ionic-team#8394) Keep top safe-area inset at 0 for Android API < 30 (legacy and modern WebView paths), preserve semantic bottom inset handling, and prevent malformed safe-area CSS custom properties from persisting across keyboard/lifecycle transitions.

…preferred conflicts)

riderx · 2026-07-14T06:40:38Z

Git applied the upstream-preferred strategy to resolve this sync. Please review the branch carefully before merging.

coderabbitai · 2026-07-14T06:40:45Z

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6af3247b-147c-4e83-80b4-bcee11ff5a30

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 63026cc and 618b0ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

android/capacitor/src/main/java/com/getcapacitor/plugin/SystemBars.java

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

github-actions · 2026-07-14T06:40:45Z

Beta npm build

Maintainers can publish one Capacitor Plus workspace package from this PR to npm for fast testing.

Comment /publish-beta <package> after the PR checks are green.

Examples:

/publish-beta core
/publish-beta cli
/publish-beta @capacitor-plus/core

If exactly one workspace package changed, /publish-beta without a package will use that package.

Packages:

core (@capacitor-plus/core)
cli (@capacitor-plus/cli)
android (@capacitor-plus/android)
ios (@capacitor-plus/ios)

The workflow will:

publish a prerelease package on the beta tag
add a pinned pr-94 dist-tag for the selected package
update this comment with the install command

Security note: beta publish is only enabled for branches inside this repository.

cursor

Risk: medium. Cursor Bugbot was not present on this PR, and no automated review reported findings requiring human attention. Approved as a focused upstream Android SystemBars sync with bounded edge-to-edge and keyboard handling changes. No reviewers assigned.

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver}

cursor

Risk: medium. Not approving — the Android SystemBars edge-to-edge/keyboard changes exceed the low-risk approval threshold. Assigned jcesarmobile and fabiomartino for human review.

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver External}

cursor

Risk: medium. Not approving — the Android SystemBars edge-to-edge/keyboard changes exceed the low-risk approval threshold. Human review is needed; reviewer assignment failed because no eligible collaborators are available outside the PR author.

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver External}

fabiomartino and others added 17 commits March 1, 2026 21:18

fix(android): implement automatic edge-to-edge and universal keyboard…

54b69ed

… handling

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

2160420

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

ae8545d

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

804e06b

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

874be5b

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

8b0c623

fix(android): fix excessive bottom safe area with keyboard

7cdf75d

feat(android): enhance SystemBars stability and keyboard handling

12270a3

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

95c5f71

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into fix/safe-area_edge2…

676f365

…edge

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

04fce44

fix(android): handle legacy safe-area fallback on API < 30

8dd0d41

Scope legacy fallback to Android API < 30 and force zero CSS safe-area vars in that path to prevent double compensation on top/bottom bars, while preserving behavior on newer API levels.

Merge branch 'main' into fix/safe-area_edge2edge

4b67673

chore: sync upstream PR ionic-team#8366 from @fabiomartino (upstream-…

618b0ce

…preferred conflicts)

cursor Bot approved these changes Jul 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

cursor Bot reviewed Jul 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

chore: sync upstream PR #8366 - fix(android): implement automatic edge-to-edge and universal keyboard handling - #94

chore: sync upstream PR #8366 - fix(android): implement automatic edge-to-edge and universal keyboard handling#94
riderx wants to merge 17 commits into
plusfrom
sync/upstream-pr-8366

riderx commented Jul 14, 2026

Uh oh!

riderx commented Jul 14, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Review limit reached

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

riderx commented Jul 14, 2026

Merge Conflict Review Required

What happened

Uh oh!

riderx commented Jul 14, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Review limit reached

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Beta npm build

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants