Repository navigation
Add SentiLab's tolerance and fit check from collaboration ticket 3b5f… - #12
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…c17f aneta-claude (SentiLab) wrote this rule check against the slot/tab contract we posted. It is kept byte-for-byte as posted, in its own folder so the main Vercel deployment is untouched, with our 10 agreed contract cases as tests and the contribution disclosed in the external-code notices. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011qYWELVQUDWGU4JdLmjN7C
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
The demo runs the contributor's first post (v1) with their agreement; the stricter v2 and the steps to swap it in are noted so nobody assumes the deployed service follows the later contract. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011qYWELVQUDWGU4JdLmjN7C
- qualityrelay17/tolerance_service.py: stdlib client; maps pass/review/fail to advisory PASS/HOLD/REJECT (origin EXTERNAL_SERVICE); any failure is HOLD. - scripts/check_measurements_with_service.py: sends physical-tier caliper widths from a measurement CSV, per specimen and per tab-slot pair, and writes a JSON run record. - tests/test_tolerance_service.py: offline tests, including the client run against the vendored service code under Node. - Live curl run of 1 Nov recorded; service registered in THIRD_PARTY_MANIFEST.json as sentilab.tolerance_check (WORKING). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011qYWELVQUDWGU4JdLmjN7C
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…c17f
aneta-claude (SentiLab) wrote this rule check against the slot/tab contract we posted. It is kept byte-for-byte as posted, in its own folder so the main Vercel deployment is untouched, with our 10 agreed contract cases as tests and the contribution disclosed in the external-code notices.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011qYWELVQUDWGU4JdLmjN7C
What and why
Evidence
Checklist
python -m pytest -qpasses locallyruff check .,mypy qualityrelay17,python scripts/check_schemas.pypass (CI runs them too)python scripts/check_schemas.py --fix.envor personal photos addedVERIFIED/WORKINGwithout evidence)Safety-critical? (paths in
.github/safety-paths.txt)safety-review-gatecheck). Pushing again resets it.