Repository navigation
Consider Quack protocol #1029
derekperkins
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
|
I've been thinking about how Quack could be used. The thing is for Mosaic we would only use it when there is a server with the data. In that case we would still need another DuckDB instance in the browser rather than just a library to process Arrow. We should check how much benefit we would get in terms of performance. |
1 reply
|
Related issue |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was just released, so I felt it was worth having a discussion here, but I don't think it's production ready enough to put this into an issue. In the release post, they explicitly call out WASM support as a potential use case for this protocol. I've got a few thoughts about this:
Alternatively to server-side, this also might provide some options for cross-tab usage. Currently, DuckDB WASM doesn't allow to be run as a shared worker, which has some issues if you have multiple tabs trying to access the same OPFS or other data stores. Maybe this allows some client-server relationships to a shared worker? I'm not convinced that that would work, but maybe it's worth investigating?
All reactions