You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
tectonic is amazing for generating outputs from scratch, and it is quite fast at that. However, when outputs from older runs already exist, it does not make use of those to speed up the compilation.
In contrast, latexmk has the ability to save some latex runs whenever some output already exists. E.g.,
If the inputs have not changed, it does not recompile the document.
Sometime when the inputs only have some small changes, one pdflatex run suffices.
It would be nice if tectonic would have similar features. I guess as a default, the current behavior is better/safer. However, this quasi-incremental build feature would be especially convenient when using with some editor with compile on save enabled.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
tectonicis amazing for generating outputs from scratch, and it is quite fast at that. However, when outputs from older runs already exist, it does not make use of those to speed up the compilation.In contrast,
latexmkhas the ability to save some latex runs whenever some output already exists. E.g.,pdflatexrun suffices.It would be nice if
tectonicwould have similar features. I guess as a default, the current behavior is better/safer. However, this quasi-incremental build feature would be especially convenient when using with some editor with compile on save enabled.What do you think?
All reactions