Question: "Geophysics" vs. "Simulation and Modelling"

[lheagy]

The "Simulation and Modelling" category is quite broad at the moment. There is lots of overlap with the "Geophysics" category: e.g. emsig, Fatiando, ResIPy, SimPEG, ... would all fit under "Geophysics". Would it help with discoverability of packages to try to move project names out of "Simulation and Modelling" which might be a bit of a catch-all at the moment?

[JustinGOSSES]

Since this issue was started, Geophysics has further shrunk to nothing as projects moved to more specific categories.

I agree with the critique that "Simulation and Modelling" is becoming a bit of a grab bag, but I'm not sure where to draw the line between "geophysics" & "Simulation and Modelling"?

Welcome further discussion and/or pull request if someone has an opinion.