CODEOWNERS

# Code owners for rossoctl/examples.
#
# Owners here are DERIVED from the project's source of truth for maintainership:
#   https://github.com/rossoctl/rossoctl/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md
#
# CODEOWNERS cannot reference that file, or any file: GitHub accepts only user and team
# handles, and it is read only from this repository's root, .github/ or docs/ -- there is no
# inheritance from rossoctl/rossoctl to lean on. So these names are a copy, and they have to
# be updated when MAINTAINERS.md changes.
#
# A rule naming a user or team that does not exist, or that lacks write access here, fails
# nothing visibly -- the matched paths just end up with no owner. GitHub does report it, in
# the CODEOWNERS file view and via the API. After editing, check that this prints []:
#   gh api 'repos/rossoctl/examples/codeowners/errors?ref=<branch>' --jq .errors

# Default owners for everything
* @rossoctl/maintainers

# Every rule below also lists @rossoctl/maintainers, because CODEOWNERS is
# last-match-wins: a path rule REPLACES the `*` default rather than adding to it. Naming
# one person alone would mean workflow edits and the Dependabot Actions bumps auto-request
# a single reviewer, with no backstop when they are away.

# CI and platform tooling, owned per MAINTAINERS.md (org-wide CI & repo governance;
# rossoctl-cli and the build).
.github/ @rubambiza @rossoctl/maintainers
Makefile @esnible @rossoctl/maintainers

# A2A agents and MCP tools
a2a/ @pdettori @rossoctl/maintainers
mcp/ @pdettori @rossoctl/maintainers

# Documentation. There is no docs/ directory in this repo -- the previous rule for it
# matched nothing. Each example documents itself in its own README.
*.md @rossoctl/maintainers