docs: small cleanups in webhook examples - #5498
Conversation
* Just a bit of formatting to make the text more readable. * The Gotify example referenced a header, it did not use. * We only have two examples, so I felt that we shouldn't hint at more examples, where there aren't any. Signed-off-by: Solomon Jacobs <solomonjacobs@protonmail.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR updates the Gotify webhook message template and related documentation. It adds structured alert headings and details, formats timestamps, changes alert checks, removes obsolete authentication text, and revises the Microsoft Teams example reference. ChangesGotify webhook documentation
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR makes localized cleanup changes to webhook documentation and the Gotify example without changing product runtime behavior. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Just a bit of cleanup after #5408

Old:
New:

Pull Request Checklist
Which user-facing changes does this PR introduce?