Skip to content

The PyWPS conda forge recipe has way too many optional dependencies #705

Description

@Zeitsperre

There are too many optional dependencies listed as part if the base requirements for the conda-forge package. This is creating situations where conflicting dependencies make it so that the PyPI package is preferred when drafting a conda recipe for a project requiring PyWPS.

pywps/pyproject.toml

Lines 35 to 48 in 5da4f20

dependencies = [
"humanize >=4.5.0",
"jinja2 >=3.1.0",
"jsonschema >=4.20.0",
"lxml >=6.0.2",
"markupsafe >=3.0.3",
"numpy >=1.22.2", # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
"owslib >=0.35.0",
"python-dateutil",
"requests >=2.32.5",
"sqlalchemy >=2.0.44",
"urllib3 >=2.5.0", # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
"werkzeug >=3.1.4",
]

conda-forge recipe: https://github.com/conda-forge/pywps-feedstock/blob/main/recipe/meta.yaml

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions