Thoughts on the Future of Decentralized Social Protocols #27
Replies: 1 comment
|
For Farcaster specifically, my hope is that the next 12-18 months turn “client features” into portable protocol surfaces. The biggest unlocked pieces are already visible in the FIP set: native channels (#14), mini-app indexing (#15), a query layer (#16), functional signers (#11), and capability manifests (#23). If those land together, a new client or agent can answer basic product questions from the network itself: what channel is this cast in, what apps exist, what permissions did a user grant, and what can be queried without a proprietary backend. The concern is sequencing. Token/reward design will get the most attention, but if the read/write surfaces stay app-specific, incentives will mostly reward activity inside the strongest existing client instead of making the protocol easier to build on. I’d measure progress less by “more monetization primitives” and more by: can a small team ship a useful client or mini-app without asking one incumbent API to explain the social graph? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hey Farcaster community,
What are your biggest hopes (and concerns) for where decentralized social protocols like Farcaster are headed in the next 12–18 months?
• Onboarding & UX improvements?
• Better monetization for creators?
• Integration with other chains/ecosystems?
• Governance or moderation challenges?
Drop your takes below — genuinely curious to hear fresh perspectives. Let’s make this a productive discussion.
All reactions