Repository navigation
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
|
UPD: |
0 replies
|
Tested on a GTX 1060 in 2560x1440. Everything looked good so far. Actually this would be the perfect scenario for an ingame benchmark to get comparable numbers. Fps table:
|
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment













Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I'm testing new stochastic fog right now. While quality is definitely better, performance cost is quite noticeable.
Please test on you hardware how much slower this fog is and post fps before-vs-after on same scene.
Also fps with
Radial fogdisabled is interesting.UPD: Merged
Performance
Here is frame comparative chart. New rendering is 6.5% slower:

Core part of algorithm is to use path tracing with
32ray steps, + random offset for each pixel.You may notice that
L1cache (Yellow) is completely trashed, probably to large distance span between shadow-map samples, on each sample.Tested with low-res (512x256) shadows - helps a little, but only a little.
Testing
Here build to test with new shading:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Try/opengothic/builds/46140513/job/5j0a451cbalra790/artifacts
Please report, if it works well on your machine.
6 votes ·
All reactions